<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-GB">
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=G4bao</id>
		<title>UK Microwave Group Wiki - User contributions [en-gb]</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=G4bao"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/Special:Contributions/G4bao"/>
		<updated>2026-05-19T06:52:30Z</updated>
		<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.29.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=24_GHz&amp;diff=964</id>
		<title>24 GHz</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=24_GHz&amp;diff=964"/>
				<updated>2021-01-03T11:49:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The UK Primary 24 GHz or 1.2cms allocation is 24.000 - 24.050 GHz with the centre of the narrow band operating segment at 24.048 GHz.  Wideband operation is centered around 24.025 GHz. In addition there is further secondary spectrum between 24.050 and 24.250 GHz of which the first 100 MHz is not currently permitted to be used in the UK. Consequently the Primary allocation is recommended for all current and future usage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Band Plan===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the [https://thersgb.org/services/bandplans/html/rsgb_band_plan_2017.htm RSGB 24GHz band plan] for full details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Beacons===&lt;br /&gt;
There are a number of narrow band beacons in the 24GHz band - see [http://www.beaconspot.uk/beaconm.php?bandmhz=24048 this page for an up to date list]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==24 GHz Equipment==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest way to get on 24GHz is to modify 23 or 26GHz telecom link equipment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A very good example of this is by G1EHF which shows how simple it is to get on 24 GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DA_24GHz.JPG|400px]] [[File:DA_24GHz_side_view.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Internally, the transverter largely comprises DMC modules from a ex-23GHz microwave link. The synthesiser and filter have been retuned to the 24GHz band, with the preamplifier, intermediate amplifier and power amplifier connected in series. These are then reversed using a coaxial transfer switch between RX and TX, providing a reasonable noise figure on RX and around 100mW on TX. An MM94P mixer and retuned filter are common to both RX and TX paths. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transverter runs from a single 12V battery and uses an FT817 on 430MHz as the IF.         The antenna is by RFS with a gain of around 36dBi. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DA_24GHz_internal_view.JPG|400px]]       [[File:DA_24GHz_front_view.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This transverter runs from a single 12V battery and uses an FT290 on 144MHz as the IF.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:24GHz_internals.jpg|400px]]      [[File:24GHz_trial.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Putting a system together ====&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps the first thing to get is your dish as this determines the hardware form factor of your system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then collect and test the modules, typically these will be:&lt;br /&gt;
*Local Oscillator block plus multiplier&lt;br /&gt;
*Receive module&lt;br /&gt;
*Transmit module&lt;br /&gt;
*Antenna changeover system - waveguide or high quality SMA relay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Local Oscillator requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To operate on the NB segment at 24,048.2 MHz the following LOs are required:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*144 MHz IF = 24048 - 144 = 23,904 MHz (/2 = 11,952 MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
*144 MHz IF = 24048 + 144 = 24,192 MHz (/2 = 12,096 MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
*432 MHz IF = 24048 - 432 = 23,616 MHz (/2 = 11,808 MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
*432 MHz IF = 24048 + 432 = 24,480 MHz (/2 = 12,240 MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LO generation can alternatively be initiated at lower frequencies with the availability of the versatile Analogue Devices Fractional N Frequency Synthesisers such as the ADF4351 shown below. These fully functional boards requiring just frequency and register programming data can be bought relatively inexpensively from a number of sources including E-Bay sellers. Programming data can be uploaded using a cheap Arduino (Mini) controller to send the required data to the synthesiser registers on power up. The output frequency can be multiplied up to the required LO value although it is likely that for narrowband use a more stable external Frequency Reference source for the synthesiser will be needed from for example, a Leo Bodnar GPS disciplined clock generator or a GPS disciplined OCXO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:20200903_161007.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DMC Equipment===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DMC modules are used by a lot of operators and there is a lot of information available on the web:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*W6BY has compiled a very useful reference list of DMC part numbers = http://www.qsl.net/w6by/parts/dmc.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* EB3FRN has some useful info and links http://www.eb3frn.net/?p=118 including details on retuning the locked oscillators and retuning the IF = http://www.eb3frn.net/?p=123&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* F1CHF has an extensive Powerpoint describing DMC equipment: http://f1chf.free.fr/F5DQK/6_Transverters/24GHz_DMC_bricks_older.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* DMC-110366 Synthesized 20 GHz Microwave Source Operation Manual [[:File:20Syn_BY.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Notes on Switch setting for DMC 20 GHz source by Rex Allers, KK6MK [[:File:DMC_SW.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Part number list and pictures of DMC modules (not all 24GHz) available here: http://www.xertech.net/Tech/DMC/DMC_main.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Information on the older 11012* modules here [[Older DMC Modules]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Moving 23 GHz DMC WG Filters up to 24 GHz [[DMC WG Filters]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Elcom synthesisers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A very common unit to generate the 13GHz LO (doubled to 24GHz) is to use the Elcom 1201 synthesiser available from ebay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* G8CUB has done an excellent article describing their use = http://www.rfdesign.co.uk/microwave/Content/Elcom%20Synth%20article.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dave Robinson G4FRE has designed a small PIC interface to program the unit = http://g4fre.com/dfs1201.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob M0DTS describes the use of the Elcom 1201 for a personal beacon http://www.m0dts.co.uk/?tag=24GHz&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* GM8BJF has developed an Arduino controller for the Elcom: https://gm8bjf.joomla.com/10-articles/11-using-arduino-microcontrollers-to-programme-microwave-synthesisers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* VK2TDN describes the use of an Elcom synthesiser and Thales 23GHz units : http://www.sydneystormcity.com/24GHz.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Croatia Microwave has some tips on getting the Elcom going if yours is faulty : http://croatia-microwave.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/playing-with-elcom-ceragon-dfs-1201.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Locking the Elcom to external 10MHz reference: http://www.vklogger.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=40&amp;amp;t=10187&amp;amp;start=20#p37834&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Increasing the maximum frequency of the Elcom Synthesiser [[Elcom Frequency Pulling]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlling an Elcom from the Portsdown System https://wiki.batc.org.uk/Portsdown_4_Signal_Generator#Using_an_Elcom_Microwave_Source_as_the_Output_Device&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This picture shows an Elcom synthesiser with the PIC loader that provides the programming data on power up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Elcom_Synth.jpg|400px]]       [[File:11952GHz.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nort Synthesized Local Oscillators===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Nort Synthesized Local Oscillators provide a stable LO signal in the 12 - 14 GHz region at about 14 dBm.  These were on sale at HamRadio 2018.  More details here: [[Nort SLO]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thales Alcatel 23GHz equipment===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of Thales / Alcatel equipment appeared on the second hand market around 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* John G4BAO wrote an article for Scatterpoint March 2010 on using these units on 24 GHz: http://www.sydneystormcity.com/Thales23GHz.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other station's systems===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* OK1VM has a lot of info and pictures but not in English http://www.ok1vm.cz/projekty/24g.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* DL4DTU Budowa system description based around DMC modules http://www.sp6gwb.pl/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Budowa-transwertera-24-GHz.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 9A4QV describes his system here http://croatia-microwave.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/eyal-gal-24ghz-transverter.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* G4NNS describes the Alcatel system and his own portable setup (currently on loan to G8GTZ) http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/g4nns/24GBits01.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==24 GHz Power amplifiers==&lt;br /&gt;
===Solid State Amplifiers=== &lt;br /&gt;
MMIC devices are available that can produce around 1W of output power at 24GHz. For example the EMM5832 device. Ready made PA's such as the Toshiba amplifier pictured come available on the surplus market from time to time. However even power levels as low as 10mW can provide useful performance when coupled with reasonable antenna gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EMM5832.jpg|400px]]         [[File:Tosh_1.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Travelling Wave Tubes===&lt;br /&gt;
here are some scans of TWT databooks. the 1987 issue contains details on the popular RW1127 TWT as described below.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:STC_TWTs 1984.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Siemens 1987 TWT Databook.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Some details and modifications on the RW1127 TWT and it's Power supply====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;classic&amp;quot; paper on the use of this TWT on 24GHz by DL7YC can be downloaded here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:dl7yc_man_twta_modifications.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also a Powerpoint presentation about the mods here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:dl7yc_pres_twta_modifications-a_rocky_road.pdf]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much practical initial work in the UK on modifying this TWT was done by Brian G4NNS so here are some of his notes for your further information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:dl7yc_modifying_the_rw1127_and_similar_twts_for_24ghz_g4nns.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RWinstNotes1.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The RWN32X series of TWT Power supplies===&lt;br /&gt;
====Circuit diagrams and datasheets====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RWN32X.pdf]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a scan of the original German language technical datasheet on the RWN32X series of TWT Power supplies &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RWN322PTechnisceDaten.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a half-decent English translation of the German text by Google and G4BAO &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:SIEMENS power supply 322P for Traveling wave tubes.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===An Arduino-based controller and sequencer for the RW32X series of TWT power supplies===&lt;br /&gt;
More information to follow! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==24 GHz Antennas==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=24_GHz&amp;diff=963</id>
		<title>24 GHz</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=24_GHz&amp;diff=963"/>
				<updated>2021-01-03T11:47:30Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: Addition of  information on RW1127 TWT from DL7YC and G4NNS&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The UK Primary 24 GHz or 1.2cms allocation is 24.000 - 24.050 GHz with the centre of the narrow band operating segment at 24.048 GHz.  Wideband operation is centered around 24.025 GHz. In addition there is further secondary spectrum between 24.050 and 24.250 GHz of which the first 100 MHz is not currently permitted to be used in the UK. Consequently the Primary allocation is recommended for all current and future usage. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Band Plan===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
See the [https://thersgb.org/services/bandplans/html/rsgb_band_plan_2017.htm RSGB 24GHz band plan] for full details.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Beacons===&lt;br /&gt;
There are a number of narrow band beacons in the 24GHz band - see [http://www.beaconspot.uk/beaconm.php?bandmhz=24048 this page for an up to date list]. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==24 GHz Equipment==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The easiest way to get on 24GHz is to modify 23 or 26GHz telecom link equipment.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A very good example of this is by G1EHF which shows how simple it is to get on 24 GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DA_24GHz.JPG|400px]] [[File:DA_24GHz_side_view.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Internally, the transverter largely comprises DMC modules from a ex-23GHz microwave link. The synthesiser and filter have been retuned to the 24GHz band, with the preamplifier, intermediate amplifier and power amplifier connected in series. These are then reversed using a coaxial transfer switch between RX and TX, providing a reasonable noise figure on RX and around 100mW on TX. An MM94P mixer and retuned filter are common to both RX and TX paths. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The transverter runs from a single 12V battery and uses an FT817 on 430MHz as the IF.         The antenna is by RFS with a gain of around 36dBi. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:DA_24GHz_internal_view.JPG|400px]]       [[File:DA_24GHz_front_view.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This transverter runs from a single 12V battery and uses an FT290 on 144MHz as the IF.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:24GHz_internals.jpg|400px]]      [[File:24GHz_trial.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Putting a system together ====&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps the first thing to get is your dish as this determines the hardware form factor of your system.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then collect and test the modules, typically these will be:&lt;br /&gt;
*Local Oscillator block plus multiplier&lt;br /&gt;
*Receive module&lt;br /&gt;
*Transmit module&lt;br /&gt;
*Antenna changeover system - waveguide or high quality SMA relay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Local Oscillator requirements===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To operate on the NB segment at 24,048.2 MHz the following LOs are required:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*144 MHz IF = 24048 - 144 = 23,904 MHz (/2 = 11,952 MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
*144 MHz IF = 24048 + 144 = 24,192 MHz (/2 = 12,096 MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
*432 MHz IF = 24048 - 432 = 23,616 MHz (/2 = 11,808 MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
*432 MHz IF = 24048 + 432 = 24,480 MHz (/2 = 12,240 MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
LO generation can alternatively be initiated at lower frequencies with the availability of the versatile Analogue Devices Fractional N Frequency Synthesisers such as the ADF4351 shown below. These fully functional boards requiring just frequency and register programming data can be bought relatively inexpensively from a number of sources including E-Bay sellers. Programming data can be uploaded using a cheap Arduino (Mini) controller to send the required data to the synthesiser registers on power up. The output frequency can be multiplied up to the required LO value although it is likely that for narrowband use a more stable external Frequency Reference source for the synthesiser will be needed from for example, a Leo Bodnar GPS disciplined clock generator or a GPS disciplined OCXO.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:20200903_161007.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===DMC Equipment===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
DMC modules are used by a lot of operators and there is a lot of information available on the web:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
*W6BY has compiled a very useful reference list of DMC part numbers = http://www.qsl.net/w6by/parts/dmc.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* EB3FRN has some useful info and links http://www.eb3frn.net/?p=118 including details on retuning the locked oscillators and retuning the IF = http://www.eb3frn.net/?p=123&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* F1CHF has an extensive Powerpoint describing DMC equipment: http://f1chf.free.fr/F5DQK/6_Transverters/24GHz_DMC_bricks_older.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* DMC-110366 Synthesized 20 GHz Microwave Source Operation Manual [[:File:20Syn_BY.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Notes on Switch setting for DMC 20 GHz source by Rex Allers, KK6MK [[:File:DMC_SW.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Part number list and pictures of DMC modules (not all 24GHz) available here: http://www.xertech.net/Tech/DMC/DMC_main.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Information on the older 11012* modules here [[Older DMC Modules]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Moving 23 GHz DMC WG Filters up to 24 GHz [[DMC WG Filters]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Elcom synthesisers===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A very common unit to generate the 13GHz LO (doubled to 24GHz) is to use the Elcom 1201 synthesiser available from ebay.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* G8CUB has done an excellent article describing their use = http://www.rfdesign.co.uk/microwave/Content/Elcom%20Synth%20article.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dave Robinson G4FRE has designed a small PIC interface to program the unit = http://g4fre.com/dfs1201.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Rob M0DTS describes the use of the Elcom 1201 for a personal beacon http://www.m0dts.co.uk/?tag=24GHz&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* GM8BJF has developed an Arduino controller for the Elcom: https://gm8bjf.joomla.com/10-articles/11-using-arduino-microcontrollers-to-programme-microwave-synthesisers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* VK2TDN describes the use of an Elcom synthesiser and Thales 23GHz units : http://www.sydneystormcity.com/24GHz.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Croatia Microwave has some tips on getting the Elcom going if yours is faulty : http://croatia-microwave.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/playing-with-elcom-ceragon-dfs-1201.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Locking the Elcom to external 10MHz reference: http://www.vklogger.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=40&amp;amp;t=10187&amp;amp;start=20#p37834&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Increasing the maximum frequency of the Elcom Synthesiser [[Elcom Frequency Pulling]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Controlling an Elcom from the Portsdown System https://wiki.batc.org.uk/Portsdown_4_Signal_Generator#Using_an_Elcom_Microwave_Source_as_the_Output_Device&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This picture shows an Elcom synthesiser with the PIC loader that provides the programming data on power up.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Elcom_Synth.jpg|400px]]       [[File:11952GHz.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Nort Synthesized Local Oscillators===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Nort Synthesized Local Oscillators provide a stable LO signal in the 12 - 14 GHz region at about 14 dBm.  These were on sale at HamRadio 2018.  More details here: [[Nort SLO]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Thales Alcatel 23GHz equipment===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A lot of Thales / Alcatel equipment appeared on the second hand market around 2010.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* John G4BAO wrote an article for Scatterpoint March 2010 on using these units on 24 GHz: http://www.sydneystormcity.com/Thales23GHz.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Other station's systems===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* OK1VM has a lot of info and pictures but not in English http://www.ok1vm.cz/projekty/24g.htm&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* DL4DTU Budowa system description based around DMC modules http://www.sp6gwb.pl/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Budowa-transwertera-24-GHz.pdf&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* 9A4QV describes his system here http://croatia-microwave.blogspot.co.uk/2014/10/eyal-gal-24ghz-transverter.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* G4NNS describes the Alcatel system and his own portable setup (currently on loan to G8GTZ) http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/g4nns/24GBits01.html&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==24 GHz Power amplifiers==&lt;br /&gt;
===Solid State Amplifiers=== &lt;br /&gt;
MMIC devices are available that can produce around 1W of output power at 24GHz. For example the EMM5832 device. Ready made PA's such as the Toshiba amplifier pictured come available on the surplus market from time to time. However even power levels as low as 10mW can provide useful performance when coupled with reasonable antenna gain.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:EMM5832.jpg|400px]]         [[File:Tosh_1.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Travelling Wave Tubes===&lt;br /&gt;
here are some scans of TWT databooks. the 1987 issue contains details on the popular RW1127 TWT as described below.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:STC_TWTs 1984.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:Siemens 1987 TWT Databook.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Some details and modifications on the RW1127 TWT and it's Power supply====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;classic&amp;quot; paper on the use of this TWT on 24GHz by DL7YC can be downloaded here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:dl7yc_man_twta_modifications.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also a Powerpoint presentation about the mods here&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:dl7yc_pres_twta_modifications-a_rocky_road.pdf]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Much practical initial work in the UK on modifying this TWT was done by Brian G4NNS so here are some of his notes for your further information.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:dl7yc_modifying_the_rw1127_and_similar_twts_for_24ghz_g4nns.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RWinstNotes1.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===The RWN32X series of TWT Power supplies===&lt;br /&gt;
====Circuit diagrams and datasheets====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RWN32X.pdf]] &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a scan of the original German language technical datasheet on the RWN32X series of TWT Power supplies &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:RWN322PTechnisceDaten.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a half-decent English translation of the German text by Google and G4BAO &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:SIEMENS power supply 322P for Traveling wave tubes.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==24 GHz Antennas==&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:SIEMENS_power_supply_322P_for_Traveling_wave_tubes.pdf&amp;diff=962</id>
		<title>File:SIEMENS power supply 322P for Traveling wave tubes.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:SIEMENS_power_supply_322P_for_Traveling_wave_tubes.pdf&amp;diff=962"/>
				<updated>2021-01-03T11:43:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:RWN322PTechnisceDaten.pdf&amp;diff=961</id>
		<title>File:RWN322PTechnisceDaten.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:RWN322PTechnisceDaten.pdf&amp;diff=961"/>
				<updated>2021-01-03T11:34:23Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:Siemens_1987_TWT_Databook.pdf&amp;diff=960</id>
		<title>File:Siemens 1987 TWT Databook.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:Siemens_1987_TWT_Databook.pdf&amp;diff=960"/>
				<updated>2021-01-03T11:31:32Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: G4bao uploaded a new version of File:Siemens 1987 TWT Databook.pdf&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:STC_TWTs_1984.pdf&amp;diff=959</id>
		<title>File:STC TWTs 1984.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:STC_TWTs_1984.pdf&amp;diff=959"/>
				<updated>2021-01-03T11:31:28Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:RWN32X.pdf&amp;diff=958</id>
		<title>File:RWN32X.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:RWN32X.pdf&amp;diff=958"/>
				<updated>2021-01-03T11:29:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:RWN32X_1.pdf&amp;diff=957</id>
		<title>File:RWN32X 1.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:RWN32X_1.pdf&amp;diff=957"/>
				<updated>2021-01-03T11:29:04Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:RWinstNotes1.doc&amp;diff=956</id>
		<title>File:RWinstNotes1.doc</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:RWinstNotes1.doc&amp;diff=956"/>
				<updated>2021-01-03T11:17:29Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:Siemens_1987_TWT_Databook.pdf&amp;diff=955</id>
		<title>File:Siemens 1987 TWT Databook.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:Siemens_1987_TWT_Databook.pdf&amp;diff=955"/>
				<updated>2021-01-03T11:15:34Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:Dl7yc_modifying_the_rw1127_and_similar_twts_for_24ghz_g4nns.pdf&amp;diff=954</id>
		<title>File:Dl7yc modifying the rw1127 and similar twts for 24ghz g4nns.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:Dl7yc_modifying_the_rw1127_and_similar_twts_for_24ghz_g4nns.pdf&amp;diff=954"/>
				<updated>2021-01-03T11:12:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:Dl7yc_pres_twta_modifications-a_rocky_road.pdf&amp;diff=953</id>
		<title>File:Dl7yc pres twta modifications-a rocky road.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:Dl7yc_pres_twta_modifications-a_rocky_road.pdf&amp;diff=953"/>
				<updated>2021-01-03T11:10:26Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:Dl7yc_man_twta_modifications.pdf&amp;diff=952</id>
		<title>File:Dl7yc man twta modifications.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:Dl7yc_man_twta_modifications.pdf&amp;diff=952"/>
				<updated>2021-01-03T11:08:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: G4bao uploaded a new version of File:Dl7yc man twta modifications.pdf&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=950</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=950"/>
				<updated>2020-12-30T22:38:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* Microwave EME */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:ukuglogo.jpg|left|80px|middle]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Welcome to the''' '''''[http://www.microwavers.org UK Microwave Group]''''' '''Wiki'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The place to find information on equipment and projects for Amateur Microwave operation on bands above 1 GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This wiki is designed to be a reference library, developed by the UK Microwave Group for use by the worldwide microwave community. Any information which you feel is of use to others can be put on the Wiki, but please observe any copyright restrictions on your material you use. However, before you can add or edit content you will need to [[Registering|register for an account]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contents ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Registering]] on the UK Microwave Wiki&lt;br /&gt;
=== New to Microwave operation? ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Get the basics in our collection of [[Getting Started|Getting Started guides]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Glossary and index of terms and TLAs used in Amateur Microwave operation [[Glossary of terms|Glossary of terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The UK Microwave Group Information and services===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joining UK Microwave Group]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Beaconspot]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Contest Calendar]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[UK Microwave Group on Twitter]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[UK Microwave Group Youtube Channel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Chip bank|The UK Microwave Chip Bank]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Scatterpoint Magazine ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Full details inc archive at: [http://scatterpoint.org/ scatterpoint.org]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Microwave Roundtables ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Presentations]] Presentations from Roundtables.&lt;br /&gt;
* Recordings from Roundtables can be found on the UK Microwave Group Youtube channel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Microwave SDR projects===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hayling project]] The UK Microwave Group SDR transceiver&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Langstone Project]] The prototype microwave SDR project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Getting on the Microwave Bands ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Low Bands:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[1.3 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[2.3 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[3.4 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The middle bands:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[5.7 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[10 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High bands&lt;br /&gt;
* [[24 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[47 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[76 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Millimetre Bands&lt;br /&gt;
* [[122 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[134 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[241 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terahertz&lt;br /&gt;
* [[275+ GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Operating ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Digital modes using WSJT]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Talkback for microwave operation including ON4KST]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?mid=1VeLnRRbLwloDTL2i9-HE2sxqL0c&amp;amp;ll=52.95536632179757%2C-0.49709419999999227&amp;amp;z=7 Google map] showing possible portable operating sites&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mapping tools]] including finding the IARU LOCATOR of a site, UK postcode to Lat and Long conversion and a topographic overlay for Google maps&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Propagation tools]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Microwave EME===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/Microwave_EME&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Measurement techniques === &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Measuring sun noise]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Realtime signal power plot]] Software from G4JNT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Construction projects ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[PE4302]] - PE4302 variable attenuator project&lt;br /&gt;
* [[ADF435x PIC]] - PIC controllers for Chinese ADF4350/4351 boards&lt;br /&gt;
=== G4BAO's Bodger's Guides ===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* Modifying AFL 900MHz Hybrids for 23cms:  [[:File:900MHz Hybrids.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Modifying Mini Circuits ZAPD1 splitters for wideband:  [[:File:Wideband splitter.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* 13cm PA using a G4BAO 23cm board and an MRF19085: [[:File:MRF19085.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Bodging 1900MHz QRO amps for 13cm:  [[:File:1900AMPS.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Using a Lucent ILam QRO SSPA on 13cm:  [[:File:ILAM_Mods1.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Using a ceramic MRF9045 in the G4BAO PA PCB:  [[:File:ceramic.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* A control board for a GaAsFET PA:  [[:File:GaAs PA control.doc]] &lt;br /&gt;
* A 70cm converter:  [[:File:70cm converter.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dishal's method for tuning up filters:   [[:File:Dishal.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Simple PIC controller to use as a beacon with the G4JNT synthesiser board:  [[:File:Beacon_PIC.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* A small, high current Stepdown PSU after a design by G3WDG:   [[:File:stepdown_PSU.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Useful Circuits and notes ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[ADF series of synthesizers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Filters]] - Collection of links and designs for that most critical but over looked component!&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pre-amps]] - Notes, suppliers and circuits of preamplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Power amplifiers]] - Notes, suppliers and circuits of power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
* [[LeoBodnar GPS Settings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Waveguide]] - An introduction to Waveguides&lt;br /&gt;
* [[G3WDG Microwave Designs]] - Construction Notes for the G3WDG Series of Kits&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Microwave signal source]] - How to generate low power test signals on all bands up to 122GHz&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Waveguide Slot Array calculator]] - Updated design sheet with standard w/g sizes and single-side array support&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Miscellaneous Equipment manuals and schematics ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mutek]] Circuits and documentation for the Mutek range of equipment&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Microwave modules]] Circuits and documentation for the Microwave modules range of equipment&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cellflex]] Data sheets for Cellflex cables&lt;br /&gt;
* Spec and technical drawings of standard, anti-cocking and precision [https://flann.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Waveguide-and-Flange-Information.pdf Flann flanges]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Test equipment manuals ===&lt;br /&gt;
For HP and Agilent equipment see the UKMicrowaves Group files at&lt;br /&gt;
[https://groups.io/g/UKMicrowaves/files/Test%20Equipment%20-%20Manuals] &lt;br /&gt;
and [https://groups.io/g/HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment groups.io] which has replaced the old&lt;br /&gt;
[https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/hp_agilent_equipment/info Yahoo group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;UKuG thanks BATC for hosting this facility&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=949</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=949"/>
				<updated>2020-12-30T22:37:57Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:ukuglogo.jpg|left|80px|middle]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Welcome to the''' '''''[http://www.microwavers.org UK Microwave Group]''''' '''Wiki'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The place to find information on equipment and projects for Amateur Microwave operation on bands above 1 GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This wiki is designed to be a reference library, developed by the UK Microwave Group for use by the worldwide microwave community. Any information which you feel is of use to others can be put on the Wiki, but please observe any copyright restrictions on your material you use. However, before you can add or edit content you will need to [[Registering|register for an account]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contents ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Registering]] on the UK Microwave Wiki&lt;br /&gt;
=== New to Microwave operation? ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Get the basics in our collection of [[Getting Started|Getting Started guides]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Glossary and index of terms and TLAs used in Amateur Microwave operation [[Glossary of terms|Glossary of terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The UK Microwave Group Information and services===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joining UK Microwave Group]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Beaconspot]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Contest Calendar]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[UK Microwave Group on Twitter]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[UK Microwave Group Youtube Channel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Chip bank|The UK Microwave Chip Bank]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Scatterpoint Magazine ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Full details inc archive at: [http://scatterpoint.org/ scatterpoint.org]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Microwave Roundtables ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Presentations]] Presentations from Roundtables.&lt;br /&gt;
* Recordings from Roundtables can be found on the UK Microwave Group Youtube channel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Microwave SDR projects===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hayling project]] The UK Microwave Group SDR transceiver&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Langstone Project]] The prototype microwave SDR project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Getting on the Microwave Bands ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Low Bands:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[1.3 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[2.3 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[3.4 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The middle bands:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[5.7 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[10 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High bands&lt;br /&gt;
* [[24 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[47 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[76 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Millimetre Bands&lt;br /&gt;
* [[122 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[134 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[241 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terahertz&lt;br /&gt;
* [[275+ GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Operating ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Digital modes using WSJT]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Talkback for microwave operation including ON4KST]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?mid=1VeLnRRbLwloDTL2i9-HE2sxqL0c&amp;amp;ll=52.95536632179757%2C-0.49709419999999227&amp;amp;z=7 Google map] showing possible portable operating sites&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mapping tools]] including finding the IARU LOCATOR of a site, UK postcode to Lat and Long conversion and a topographic overlay for Google maps&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Propagation tools]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Microwave EME===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Measurement techniques === &lt;br /&gt;
* [[Measuring sun noise]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Realtime signal power plot]] Software from G4JNT&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Construction projects ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[PE4302]] - PE4302 variable attenuator project&lt;br /&gt;
* [[ADF435x PIC]] - PIC controllers for Chinese ADF4350/4351 boards&lt;br /&gt;
=== G4BAO's Bodger's Guides ===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* Modifying AFL 900MHz Hybrids for 23cms:  [[:File:900MHz Hybrids.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Modifying Mini Circuits ZAPD1 splitters for wideband:  [[:File:Wideband splitter.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* 13cm PA using a G4BAO 23cm board and an MRF19085: [[:File:MRF19085.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Bodging 1900MHz QRO amps for 13cm:  [[:File:1900AMPS.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Using a Lucent ILam QRO SSPA on 13cm:  [[:File:ILAM_Mods1.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Using a ceramic MRF9045 in the G4BAO PA PCB:  [[:File:ceramic.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* A control board for a GaAsFET PA:  [[:File:GaAs PA control.doc]] &lt;br /&gt;
* A 70cm converter:  [[:File:70cm converter.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dishal's method for tuning up filters:   [[:File:Dishal.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Simple PIC controller to use as a beacon with the G4JNT synthesiser board:  [[:File:Beacon_PIC.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* A small, high current Stepdown PSU after a design by G3WDG:   [[:File:stepdown_PSU.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Useful Circuits and notes ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[ADF series of synthesizers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Filters]] - Collection of links and designs for that most critical but over looked component!&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pre-amps]] - Notes, suppliers and circuits of preamplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Power amplifiers]] - Notes, suppliers and circuits of power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
* [[LeoBodnar GPS Settings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Waveguide]] - An introduction to Waveguides&lt;br /&gt;
* [[G3WDG Microwave Designs]] - Construction Notes for the G3WDG Series of Kits&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Microwave signal source]] - How to generate low power test signals on all bands up to 122GHz&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Waveguide Slot Array calculator]] - Updated design sheet with standard w/g sizes and single-side array support&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Miscellaneous Equipment manuals and schematics ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mutek]] Circuits and documentation for the Mutek range of equipment&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Microwave modules]] Circuits and documentation for the Microwave modules range of equipment&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cellflex]] Data sheets for Cellflex cables&lt;br /&gt;
* Spec and technical drawings of standard, anti-cocking and precision [https://flann.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Waveguide-and-Flange-Information.pdf Flann flanges]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Test equipment manuals ===&lt;br /&gt;
For HP and Agilent equipment see the UKMicrowaves Group files at&lt;br /&gt;
[https://groups.io/g/UKMicrowaves/files/Test%20Equipment%20-%20Manuals] &lt;br /&gt;
and [https://groups.io/g/HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment groups.io] which has replaced the old&lt;br /&gt;
[https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/hp_agilent_equipment/info Yahoo group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;UKuG thanks BATC for hosting this facility&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Hayling_project&amp;diff=895</id>
		<title>Hayling project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Hayling_project&amp;diff=895"/>
				<updated>2020-10-04T22:32:53Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: Notes the abandonment of the Hayling Concept&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Following on from discussions at the 2019 Martlesham and Crawley Microwave roundtables about the need for an SDR based Microwave transceiver, Noel G8GTZ in September 2019 published a project proposal which set out the idea of a phased development based on the Rpi to provide an all mode transceiver for microwave bands up to 3.4Ghz and possibly 5.7Ghz, using the Pluto SDR hardware.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Colin G4EML volunteered to be the main contact point for the project and Heather M0HMO has offered to contribute to the project which will be hosted on GitHub&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 We are looking for others to contribute towards the code or publish designs in ScatterPoint for the additional system components such as Pas, LNAs and higher band transverters.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project proposal===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The original project proposal is available for download here:  [[:File:The Hayling project version 1.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Early Prototype ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Colin G4EML demonstrated an early proof of concept in early November 2019 - this was named the [[Langstone Project|Langstone prototype...]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Project Abandoned September 2020 ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Langstone advanced and matured rapidly outside the UKug and the Hayling project made no progress so  the UKuG Committee decided at the last meeting in September to abandon The Hayling Project. &lt;br /&gt;
This page is for historical interest only&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Langstone_Project&amp;diff=894</id>
		<title>Langstone Project</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Langstone_Project&amp;diff=894"/>
				<updated>2020-10-04T22:27:00Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: Notes the demise of the hayling project&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;The Langstone project is an all mode Microwave transceiver covering bands from 70MHz to 5.7GHz running on a Raspberry Pi4 and the Adalm Pluto.&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Langstone.JPG|400px|center]]&lt;br /&gt;
 The project started life as an early prototype for the [[Hayling project]] and is named Langstone as it is on the way to Hayling Island!&lt;br /&gt;
Since the demise of the Hayling project, the Langstone has now gone mainstream!  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Prototype demo== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Colin, G4EML demonstrated an early prototype in early November 2019 running on an RPi4 with USB audio dongle and a Pluto SDR enabling NB operation all bands from 70MHz to 5.6Ghz! &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The prototype was running a touchscreen gui written in c controlling gnu radio.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:beta Hayling.JPG|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Features==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Touch screen user interface&lt;br /&gt;
* All mode (CW/SSB/FM/AM) narrow band transceiver&lt;br /&gt;
* 70MHz - 5.7GHz (the unit will actually generate a signal from 47 MHz to 6 GHz)&lt;br /&gt;
* Experimental support for 10GHz and 24GHz using Harmonic mixing&lt;br /&gt;
* Waterfall spectrum display&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is a recent view of the receive screen&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Langstone G8GKQ.jpg|408px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==How to build a Langstone==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Obtain the items listed in the hardware section of this wiki under 'Required Items'&lt;br /&gt;
* Plug all the USB items into the Raspberry Pi &lt;br /&gt;
* Create the SD card and install the software software using the instructions found at https://github.com/g4eml/Langstone&lt;br /&gt;
* The Pi should reboot and start the Langstone Transceiver. Audio output will be from the USB Dongle Headphone connector. Microphone input will be through the USB Dongle Microphone Input. &lt;br /&gt;
* For initial testing the touchscreen PTT can be used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Hardware==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Required Items===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the minimum required list of items to build a working Langstone. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Raspberry Pi Model 4  (2GB version is OK)&lt;br /&gt;
* 16Gb micro SD card&lt;br /&gt;
* Adalm Pluto with extended frequency modification. &lt;br /&gt;
* Official Raspberry Pi 7&amp;quot; Touch screen or Pimoroni Hyperpixel4 4&amp;quot; touchscreen&lt;br /&gt;
* USB audio dongle (see below)&lt;br /&gt;
* Wired USB Mouse with scroll wheel&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Optional Items===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* MCP23017 i2c module for Digital I/O when using the Hyperpixel Display. Can also be used with the 7&amp;quot; display if preferred to using the Pi GPIO pins. &lt;br /&gt;
* Audio Amplifier and speaker. (Volume control might also be useful here)&lt;br /&gt;
* PTT Switch and Key.&lt;br /&gt;
* Panel mounted rotary encoder and two push buttons for tuning. (Wired to mouse board as described below) &lt;br /&gt;
* Relays with drivers for control of external devices.&lt;br /&gt;
* External Pre-amps, Power-Amps and Filters for your required bands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is possible to use the BATC Portsdown band switching and PTT control hardware - https://wiki.batc.org.uk/Portsdown2019_hardware#4-Band_Decode_Switch&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===External rotary encoder for tuning===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The tuning uses the scroll wheel and buttons on a USB mouse.  You can modify this to use a panel-mounted encoder and buttons by taking a mouse apart, cutting the tracks to the scroll wheel encoder and connecting external buttons and an encoder as shown here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Mouse.jpg|480px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===USB Audio Adapter===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recommended USB Audio adapter is a cheap (under £5) adapter from eBay like this.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Audio Dongle.JPG|401px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One working example showed up in Linux as:&lt;br /&gt;
 pi@raspberrypi:~ $ lsusb&lt;br /&gt;
 Bus 001 Device 005: ID 1b3f:2008 Generalplus Technology Inc.&lt;br /&gt;
 pi@raspberrypi:~ $&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The audio device is named in the GNU Radio Modules and alternative devices will need the code modfiying before they will work.  For the receiver, it is line 74 (this may change) in Lang_RX.py:&lt;br /&gt;
 self.audio_sink_0 = audio.sink(48000, &amp;quot;hw:CARD=Device,DEV=0&amp;quot;, False)&lt;br /&gt;
and for the transmitter it is line 64 (this may change) in Lang_TX.py&lt;br /&gt;
 self.audio_sink_0 = audio.sink(48000, &amp;quot;hw:CARD=Device,DEV=0&amp;quot;, False)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can find the replacement text for the receiver by running &lt;br /&gt;
 aplay -L | grep '^hw:'&lt;br /&gt;
The entry &amp;quot;hw:CARD=Headphones,DEV=0&amp;quot; is for the Raspberry Pi 3.5mm audio jack output.  The subsequent hw:... entry is probably what you are looking for.&lt;br /&gt;
To get the microphone device name, run&lt;br /&gt;
 arecord -L | grep '^hw:'&lt;br /&gt;
There is no default Raspberry Pi device, so there is probably only one hw:... entry.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For both the transmitter and receiver the audio device sample rate must be 48000.  Devices that do not support this sample rate will not work.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Depending on the microphone being used, an amplifier may be required in front of this adapter.  The SL6270C is still available (on eBay) as a cheap solution that provides ALC and filtering.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Hyperpixel4 4&amp;quot; Touchscreen===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As a smaller alternative to the official Raspberry Pi 7&amp;quot; touchscreen the software has additional support for the Pimoroni Hyperpixel4 4&amp;quot; touchscreen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This screen requires special drivers to be installed. This is included in the install_hyperpixel4.sh script on the github page.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that this screen is not currently supported by the Portsdown project, so a combined Portsdown/Langstone is not possible if you choose this screen. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hyperpixel4.jpg|480px]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Hyperpixel4 side.jpg|480px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===MCP23017 i2c expander===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the Hyperpixel4 screen uses virtually all of the Raspberry Pi GPIO there is no spare capacity for the Hardware PTT, Key and Band Select inputs and outputs. &lt;br /&gt;
To provide more I/O Pins the software supports an external i2c connected expander board using the MCP23017 chip. This provides 16 digital input or outputs and is connected to the Hyperpixel4 display i2c connector.&lt;br /&gt;
These modules are available at low cost (under £5) from eBay. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:MCP23017.jpg|480px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The connections for the module are shown in the table below.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The module needs to be configured as device address 20. This is done by grounding pins A0, A1 and A2. On some modules this is the default setting on others you may have to add jumpers. &lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
It can be used on either the Hyperpixel4 display by connecting to the built in i2c connector or on the Raspberry Pi when using the 7&amp;quot; display by connecting to the GPIO Pins. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Signal !! HyperPixel4 !! Pi GPIO Pin&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| VCC || 3V3 || 1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| GND || GND || 6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| SCL || SCL || 5 &lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| SDA || SDA || 3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| RST || N/C || N/C&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ITA || N/C || N/C&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| ITB || N/C || N/C&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
N/C= No Connection&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You can check that the module is recognised by entering one of the following commands:-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
sudo i2cdetect -y 11     (for the 4&amp;quot; display)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
sudo i2cdetect -y 1      (for the 7&amp;quot; display)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You should see device 20 present in the displayed matrix &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
     &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;0  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  a  b  c  d  e  f&lt;br /&gt;
00:          -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --&lt;br /&gt;
10: -- -- -- -- UU -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --&lt;br /&gt;
20: 20 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --&lt;br /&gt;
30: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --&lt;br /&gt;
40: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --&lt;br /&gt;
50: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --&lt;br /&gt;
60: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --&lt;br /&gt;
70: -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===GPIO Pins===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the assignments for the digital inputs and outputs.&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The PTT input and the Key input must have pull up resistors connected between the relevant pin and 3.3V.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The PTT Switch and Key should ground these pins when activated.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Tx and Band Outputs are 0v for off and 3.3V for on. These outputs will need to be externally buffered to drive relays etc. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Function !! GPIO Pin !! Pluto GPO !! MCP23017&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| PTT Input || 11 || N/A || PA0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Key Input || 12 || N/A || PA1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Tx Output || 40 || GPO0 || PA7&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Band 0 Output || 28 || GPO1 || PB0&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Band 1 Output || 35 || GPO2 || PB1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Band 2 Output || 7 || GPO3 || PB2&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Band 3 Output || 22 || N/A || PB3&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Band 4 Output || 16 || N/A || PB4&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Band 5 Output || 18 || N/A || PB5&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Band 6 Output || 19 || N/A || PB6&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Band 7 Output || 21 || N/A || PB7&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Details==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===User Interface===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* The Langstone is intended to be used with the touchscreen and a mouse scroll wheel and buttons. The scroll wheel is used for tuning and adjusting values, the mouse buttons select the digit to be tuned. Mouse movement is not used. Normally a tuning knob will be connected to the scroll wheel. For this description 'Tuning Knob' and 'Scroll Wheel' are the same thing.   &lt;br /&gt;
* The screen always shows the currently tuned frequency in large digits. One digit will be underlined, this is the digit that will be adjusted with the tuning knob. Touching a digit on the screen or using the left and right mouse buttons will move the underline.&lt;br /&gt;
* Below the frequency display is the spectrum display and waterfall. This shows signals + and - 20Khz from the centre frequency. A red vertical line shows the tuned frequency and an orange bar shows the receiver bandwidth. &lt;br /&gt;
* The top left of the screen shows the S meter. This indicates the maximum level detected within the receiver bandwidth. Zero Level is adjusted in the Settings menu. Calibration is 6dB per S-Point. &lt;br /&gt;
* Status Indicators are displayed above the frequency display.&lt;br /&gt;
* When operating is SSB or CW the RIT button is displayed to the right of the frequency display. Touching this button turns it red and allows the RIT to be tuned using the tuning dial. touching it again return to normal tuning. Touching the 'Zero' button zeros the RIT and returns to normal tuning. &lt;br /&gt;
* To the right of the Waterfall is the volume button. Touching this button allows the volume to be adjusted using the tuning dial. Touching it again return to normal tuning. &lt;br /&gt;
* When operating in FM Mode the Squelch Button is displayed to the left of the waterfall. Touching this button allows the squelch to be adjusted using the tuning dial. Touching it again return to normal tuning. &lt;br /&gt;
* At the bottom of the screen are the function buttons.&lt;br /&gt;
* BAND&lt;br /&gt;
Selects a popup menu of the first 6 of the 12 available bands. Selecting More.. will display the second 6 bands. Touching any band button will switch to that band. &lt;br /&gt;
Note:- the bands are really just 12 separate VFOs. Any one can be set to any frequency. The label on the button is taken from the last used frequency in MHz. &lt;br /&gt;
* MODE&lt;br /&gt;
Selects a popup menu of the available modes, USB, LSB, CW, CWN, FM, and AM. Touching any button will switch to that mode. CWN uses a narrow filter centred on 800Hz.&lt;br /&gt;
* DUP&lt;br /&gt;
Displayed when in FM mode. Turns on the repeater shift. Whilst transmitting this button changes to '1750', touching this button transmits a 1750Hz access tone for repeaters.   &lt;br /&gt;
* SET&lt;br /&gt;
Selects the Settings mode described below. Whilst in the settings menu the right hand button shows 'Shutdown', touching this button will close down the program ready for power off. &lt;br /&gt;
* DOTS&lt;br /&gt;
Switches to CW Mode and transmits a constant stream of dots. Used for microwave bands to provide an antenna alignment signal. Touching the button a second time returns to receive.  &lt;br /&gt;
* PTT &lt;br /&gt;
Manually turns on the transmitter. Touching the button a second time returns to receive. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Settings===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Touching the SET button will display a series of adjustable values. Step through the available values using the NEXT and PREV buttons. Adjust the values using the tuning knob (Mouse Scroll Wheel). For some settings the left and right mouse buttons select the digit to be adjusted. Touching the MENU button exits from the settings menu. &lt;br /&gt;
Most settings have a different value for each band but some are common to all bands. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The available settings are as follows:-&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* SSB Mic Gain &lt;br /&gt;
Adjusts the level of the microphone input when in SSB mode. Common to all bands.&lt;br /&gt;
* FM Mic Gain &lt;br /&gt;
Adjust the level of the microphone input when in FM Mode. Common to all bands. &lt;br /&gt;
* Repeater Shift&lt;br /&gt;
Sets the repeater shift when working in FM Duplex mode.&lt;br /&gt;
* Rx Offset &lt;br /&gt;
Applies an offset to the displayed frequency. The display also shows the actual frequency being received. This is primarily used with transverters.&lt;br /&gt;
* Rx Harmonic Mixing&lt;br /&gt;
Can be set to X1 or X5. Normally set to X1, when set to X5 the receiver will use the 5th Harmonic of the LO for reception. See the description for 10GHz use for more detail. &lt;br /&gt;
* Tx Offset&lt;br /&gt;
Applies an offset to the displayed frequency when transmitting. The display also shows the actual frequency which would be transmitted. This is primarily used with transverters.&lt;br /&gt;
* Tx Harmonic Mixing&lt;br /&gt;
Can be set to X1, X2 or X5. Normally set to X1, When set to X2 the output frequency will be half of that displayed. This is for use of an external doubler such as used in the Hydra Modules by OE8FNK. when set to X5 the receiver will use the 5th Harmonic of the LO for reception. See the description for 10GHz use for more detail. &lt;br /&gt;
* Band Bits &lt;br /&gt;
This is the binary value that will be output to the band select outputs when the current band is selected. Any pattern can be selected for operation of external relays etc. &lt;br /&gt;
* FFT Ref&lt;br /&gt;
This sets the reference level for the Spectrum display and Waterfall. External Pre-amps will affect the noise level with no signal, you will need to adjust the refence level to give a suitable display. &lt;br /&gt;
* Tx Att&lt;br /&gt;
Adjust the level of the Transmitter output. This has a range of 0 to -89 dB. This is to allow the signal level to be adjusted to suit external amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
* S-Meter Zero&lt;br /&gt;
This sets the signal level that is displayed as S0 on the display. It should be adjusted to compensate for any pre-amplifier noise. &lt;br /&gt;
* SSB Rx Filter Low&lt;br /&gt;
This sets the low frequency cut-off of the SSB receive filter. Normal setting is 300 Hz. Common to all bands.&lt;br /&gt;
* SSB Rx Filter High&lt;br /&gt;
This sets the high frequency cut-off of the SSB receive filter. Normal Setting is 3000 Hz. Common to all bands.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Typical Power Output===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The output power was measured on NBFM.  SSB outputs peak near these levels.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Frequency !! Output Power&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 144 MHz || + 1.0 dBm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 432 MHz || + 3.5 dBm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1296 MHz || +2.5 dBm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2400 MHz || + 1.0 dBm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 3400 MHz || 0.0 dBm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 5760 MHz || -3.0 dBm&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10368 MHz || -30 dBm&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Software and code==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Langstone software along with easy to follow installation instructions is available on [https://github.com/g4eml/Langstone G4EML github].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The project is open source using GNU radio modules and all code is available on Github.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To update an existing installation to the latest version, log in using ssh, paste in these lines (without the comments):&lt;br /&gt;
 cd/home/pi                                          # Make sure we're in the right place&lt;br /&gt;
 Langstone/stop                                      # Stop the Langstone&lt;br /&gt;
 killall rpidatvgui                                  # Stop the Portsdown if it is installed&lt;br /&gt;
 rm -rf Langstone                                    # Remove the old Langstone build&lt;br /&gt;
 git clone https://github.com/g4eml/Langstone.git  # Clone the latest version of Langstone&lt;br /&gt;
 cd Langstone                                        # Move into the new Langstone folder&lt;br /&gt;
 ./build                                             # Build the c executable for Langstone&lt;br /&gt;
 ./run                                               # Run Langstone&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;quot;killall rpidatvgui&amp;quot; line is only required if you have the Portsdown A27 build loaded on the same system.  Do remember that if you have the Portsdown loaded, there is an &amp;quot;Update Langstone&amp;quot; Menu option accessed from Menu 3.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Discussion Forum==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is a discussion forum about the Langstone hosted on the BATC Forum here: https://forum.batc.org.uk/viewforum.php?f=129&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Comments and issues==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Changing Pluto IP address===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Pluto comes pre-configured with the IP address 192.168.2.1.  If this conflicts with your local network, this Analog Devices web page describes how to change it by editing the config.txt file on the Pluto https://wiki.analog.com/university/tools/pluto/users/customizing?rev=1575147632&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most recent Langstone code (19 May 2020 and later), copes with the changed Pluto IP address without any modification.  However, if you load the Portsdown A27 system alongside the Langstone, you will need to set the revised Pluto IP address in the Langstone Configuration on the Portsdown Menu 3.  This is to enable a smooth transition between Langsone and Portsdown functionality.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Inverting the Screen Image===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
If you have used an official Raspberry Pi Case, you may find that the Langstone screen image is inverted.  To correct it, simply edit the file /boot/config.txt (using sudo):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Remove or comment out the line &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 lcd_rotate=2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Then save and restart.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Portsdown Integration===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The latest version of the Portsdown DATV System, the Portsdown 4, is compatible with the Langstone transceiver when using the 7&amp;quot; touchscreen.  If you want both capabilities in one sytem, simply build the Portsdown 4 as detailed here https://wiki.batc.org.uk/Portsdown_4 and then go to Menu 3, Langstone Config and select &amp;quot;Install Langstone&amp;quot;.  You can then select the Langstone from Menu 2 of the Portsdown and return to the Portdown from the Settings menu of the Langstone.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
An earlier experimental version of the Portsdown software (known as the Portsdown A27) was developed that allowed the Langstone hardware to be used as the basis for a Portsdown DATV Transceiver.  This version has now been discontinued; there is no upgrade path from the Portsdown A27 to the Portsdown 4. You must rebuild the SD Card.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Here is G8GKQ's Portsdown/Langstone receiving the QO-100 DATV Beacon.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Portsdown A27 RX.jpg|705px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===10GHz operation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Although the upper frequency limit of the Pluto (with expanded frequency mod) is 6GHz it has been found that it also produces significant harmonic content. This can be utilised to further extend its coverage to include the 10Ghz band. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two experimental options have been added to the Langstone setup menus. These are called 'Rx Harmonic Mixing' and 'Tx Harmonic Mixing' and can be set to 1X or 5X. 1X is the default and is the normal mode for Bands up to 6 Ghz. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Selecting the 5X mode causes the Langstone to program the Pluto for one fifth of the displayed frequency. So for a displayed frequency of 10368 Mhz it will be programmed for 2073.6 MHz. The fifth harmonic of this signal is then modulated to provide a low level signal at 10368. A similar thing happens on receive where the 5th Harmonic of the LO is used. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note that when using Harmonic mixing you need to ensure that Tx Offset and Rx Offset are set to zero. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The output spectrum contains both a signal at 2073.6 MHz and a lower power signal at 10368 MHz. To make use of the higher frequency it is necessary to externally filter out the lower one. This can be done with simple pipecap filters as shown below or even simply by feeding a waveguide 16 antenna which will not pass the lower frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pipecap Filter.jpg|480px]]  &lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Pipecap Filter Under.jpg|480px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The output power and also the receive sensitivity are much lower than for normal 1X use. Some initial experiments have shown that around 30dB of external gain is required in both the transmit and receive paths. With this extra gain the transmit power will be approximately 0dBm (1mW) and the receive sensitivity will be on a par with other systems. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Even without amplification it should be possible to have short range QSOs on 10 GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===24GHz operation===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The comments above for 10GHz also apply to 24GHz. The output power and receive sensitivity on this band are extremely low, however it can be used as a test signal and receiver for short range testing of other equipment. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Langstone user experiences==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Langstone3.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dave G4FRE has used the Langstone for QSOs on 3.4GHz and received the GB3OHM beacon on 5.7GHz as shown here.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:Panel.jpg|600px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* Dave G8GKQ has received the GB3USK beacon on 23cms and is currently building a Langstone into a box....&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Glossary_of_terms&amp;diff=808</id>
		<title>Glossary of terms</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Glossary_of_terms&amp;diff=808"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:37:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Below is a list of TLAs - Three Letter Acronyms...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* BPF   Band Pass Filter.&lt;br /&gt;
* LFSR  Linear Feedback Shift Register (as in PN generator).&lt;br /&gt;
* LNA   Low Noise Amplifier&lt;br /&gt;
* PN    Pseudo Noise.&lt;br /&gt;
* PRBS  Pseudo Random Bit Sequence.&lt;br /&gt;
* RDDS  Reverse Direct Digital Synthesis&lt;br /&gt;
* EME Earth Moon Earth (Moonbounce)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=807</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=807"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:29:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* 3cm power amplifiers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2.3GHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2400.0 - 2405 &amp;amp; 2424 *&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan, 13cm EME was first licensed in 1993 for JA4BLC. The band was then &lt;br /&gt;
2424.0-2424.5. On Jan 2015, the post authority in Japan allowed the operation on&lt;br /&gt;
2400-2405 for amateurs for EME and all Japanese moonbouncers moved&lt;br /&gt;
to 2400. The 2424.0-2424.5 segment is still allowed but suffers badly from QRM from Wifi.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore all Japanese operation is on 2400 - 2405.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
Input needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board https://www.w6pql.com/amplifier_control_board.htm is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. DL7YC has detailed mods for this unit.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:DL7YC-3400.pdf]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTs like the RW1127 can be made to operate on both 10 and 24GHz.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:dl7yc_man_twta_modifications.pdf]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Anyone using this technique to bring mains voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice from a professional electrician before doing it. The author is not responsible for your careless actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Bartram G4DGU produced a good paper on small dish EME, you can read it here &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar and equatorial mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_mount&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical 3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) https://www.kuhne-electronic.com/funk/en/ and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI) https://www.downeastmicrowave.com/. Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:Dl7yc_man_twta_modifications.pdf&amp;diff=806</id>
		<title>File:Dl7yc man twta modifications.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:Dl7yc_man_twta_modifications.pdf&amp;diff=806"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:28:07Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=805</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=805"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:26:51Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* 3cm power amplifiers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2.3GHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2400.0 - 2405 &amp;amp; 2424 *&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan, 13cm EME was first licensed in 1993 for JA4BLC. The band was then &lt;br /&gt;
2424.0-2424.5. On Jan 2015, the post authority in Japan allowed the operation on&lt;br /&gt;
2400-2405 for amateurs for EME and all Japanese moonbouncers moved&lt;br /&gt;
to 2400. The 2424.0-2424.5 segment is still allowed but suffers badly from QRM from Wifi.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore all Japanese operation is on 2400 - 2405.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
Input needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board https://www.w6pql.com/amplifier_control_board.htm is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. DL7YC has detailed mods for this unit.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:DL7YC-3400.pdf]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Anyone using this technique to bring mains voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice from a professional electrician before doing it. The author is not responsible for your careless actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Bartram G4DGU produced a good paper on small dish EME, you can read it here &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar and equatorial mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_mount&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical 3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) https://www.kuhne-electronic.com/funk/en/ and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI) https://www.downeastmicrowave.com/. Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=804</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=804"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:26:11Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2.3GHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2400.0 - 2405 &amp;amp; 2424 *&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan, 13cm EME was first licensed in 1993 for JA4BLC. The band was then &lt;br /&gt;
2424.0-2424.5. On Jan 2015, the post authority in Japan allowed the operation on&lt;br /&gt;
2400-2405 for amateurs for EME and all Japanese moonbouncers moved&lt;br /&gt;
to 2400. The 2424.0-2424.5 segment is still allowed but suffers badly from QRM from Wifi.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore all Japanese operation is on 2400 - 2405.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
Input needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board https://www.w6pql.com/amplifier_control_board.htm is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. DL7YC has detailed mods for this unit.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:DL7YC-3400.pdf]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Anyone using this technique to bring mains voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice from a professional electrician before doing it. The author is not responsible for your careless actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Bartram G4DGU produced a good paper on small dish EME, you can read it here &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar and equatorial mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_mount&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical 3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) https://www.kuhne-electronic.com/funk/en/ and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI) https://www.downeastmicrowave.com/. Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=803</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=803"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:25:08Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2.3GHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2400.0 - 2405 &amp;amp; 2424 *&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan, 13cm EME was first licensed in 1993 for JA4BLC. The band was then &lt;br /&gt;
2424.0-2424.5. On Jan 2015, the post authority in Japan allowed the operation on&lt;br /&gt;
2400-2405 for amateurs for EME and all Japanese moonbouncers moved&lt;br /&gt;
to 2400. The 2424.0-2424.5 segment is still allowed but suffers badly from QRM from Wifi.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore all Japanese operation is on 2400 - 2405.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
Input needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board https://www.w6pql.com/amplifier_control_board.htm is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. DL7YC has detailed mods for this unit.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:DL7YC-3400.pdf]] &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Anyone using this technique to bring mains voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice from a professional electrician before doing it. The author is not responsible for your careless actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Bartram G4DGU produced a good paper on small dish EME, you can read it here &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar and equatorial mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_mount&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical 3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) https://www.kuhne-electronic.com/funk/en/ and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI) https://www.downeastmicrowave.com/. Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:DL7YC-3400.pdf&amp;diff=802</id>
		<title>File:DL7YC-3400.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:DL7YC-3400.pdf&amp;diff=802"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:24:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=801</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=801"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:22:50Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* Power Amplifier considerations */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2.3GHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2400.0 - 2405 &amp;amp; 2424 *&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan, 13cm EME was first licensed in 1993 for JA4BLC. The band was then &lt;br /&gt;
2424.0-2424.5. On Jan 2015, the post authority in Japan allowed the operation on&lt;br /&gt;
2400-2405 for amateurs for EME and all Japanese moonbouncers moved&lt;br /&gt;
to 2400. The 2424.0-2424.5 segment is still allowed but suffers badly from QRM from Wifi.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore all Japanese operation is on 2400 - 2405.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
Input needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board https://www.w6pql.com/amplifier_control_board.htm is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ==== &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Anyone using this technique to bring mains voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice from a professional electrician before doing it. The author is not responsible for your careless actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Bartram G4DGU produced a good paper on small dish EME, you can read it here &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar and equatorial mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_mount&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical 3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) https://www.kuhne-electronic.com/funk/en/ and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI) https://www.downeastmicrowave.com/. Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=800</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=800"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:21:24Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* Tracking systems */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2.3GHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2400.0 - 2405 &amp;amp; 2424 *&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan, 13cm EME was first licensed in 1993 for JA4BLC. The band was then &lt;br /&gt;
2424.0-2424.5. On Jan 2015, the post authority in Japan allowed the operation on&lt;br /&gt;
2400-2405 for amateurs for EME and all Japanese moonbouncers moved&lt;br /&gt;
to 2400. The 2424.0-2424.5 segment is still allowed but suffers badly from QRM from Wifi.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore all Japanese operation is on 2400 - 2405.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
Input needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations === &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board https://www.w6pql.com/amplifier_control_board.htmis recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Anyone using this technique to bring mains voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice from a professional electrician before doing it. The author is not responsible for your careless actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Bartram G4DGU produced a good paper on small dish EME, you can read it here &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar and equatorial mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_mount&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical 3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) https://www.kuhne-electronic.com/funk/en/ and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI) https://www.downeastmicrowave.com/. Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=799</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=799"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:18:58Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* Transverters */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2.3GHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2400.0 - 2405 &amp;amp; 2424 *&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan, 13cm EME was first licensed in 1993 for JA4BLC. The band was then &lt;br /&gt;
2424.0-2424.5. On Jan 2015, the post authority in Japan allowed the operation on&lt;br /&gt;
2400-2405 for amateurs for EME and all Japanese moonbouncers moved&lt;br /&gt;
to 2400. The 2424.0-2424.5 segment is still allowed but suffers badly from QRM from Wifi.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore all Japanese operation is on 2400 - 2405.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
Input needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations ===&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Anyone using this technique to bring mains voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice from a professional electrician before doing it. The author is not responsible for your careless actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Bartram G4DGU produced a good paper on small dish EME, you can read it here &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar and equatorial mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_mount&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical 3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) https://www.kuhne-electronic.com/funk/en/ and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI) https://www.downeastmicrowave.com/. Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=798</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=798"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:16:16Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* Frequency allocations at 10GHz */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2.3GHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2400.0 - 2405 &amp;amp; 2424 *&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan, 13cm EME was first licensed in 1993 for JA4BLC. The band was then &lt;br /&gt;
2424.0-2424.5. On Jan 2015, the post authority in Japan allowed the operation on&lt;br /&gt;
2400-2405 for amateurs for EME and all Japanese moonbouncers moved&lt;br /&gt;
to 2400. The 2424.0-2424.5 segment is still allowed but suffers badly from QRM from Wifi.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore all Japanese operation is on 2400 - 2405.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
Input needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations ===&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Anyone using this technique to bring mains voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice from a professional electrician before doing it. The author is not responsible for your careless actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Bartram G4DGU produced a good paper on small dish EME, you can read it here &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar and equatorial mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_mount&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical 3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI). Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=797</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=797"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:14:56Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* Tracking encoders */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2.3GHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2400.0 - 2405 &amp;amp; 2424 *&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan, 13cm EME was first licensed in 1993 for JA4BLC. The band was then &lt;br /&gt;
2424.0-2424.5. On Jan 2015, the post authority in Japan allowed the operation on&lt;br /&gt;
2400-2405 for amateurs for EME and all Japanese moonbouncers moved&lt;br /&gt;
to 2400. The 2424.0-2424.5 segment is still allowed but suffers badly from QRM from Wifi.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore all Japanese operation is on 2400 - 2405.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
Input needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations ===&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Anyone using this technique to bring mains voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice from a professional electrician before doing it. The author is not responsible for your careless actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. Japan uses 10450MHz. This&lt;br /&gt;
is not a major obstacle to working Japan as will be explained later in this section.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Bartram G4DGU produced a good paper on small dish EME, you can read it here &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar and equatorial mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_mount&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical 3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI). Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=796</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=796"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:13:48Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* Polar mounts */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2.3GHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2400.0 - 2405 &amp;amp; 2424 *&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan, 13cm EME was first licensed in 1993 for JA4BLC. The band was then &lt;br /&gt;
2424.0-2424.5. On Jan 2015, the post authority in Japan allowed the operation on&lt;br /&gt;
2400-2405 for amateurs for EME and all Japanese moonbouncers moved&lt;br /&gt;
to 2400. The 2424.0-2424.5 segment is still allowed but suffers badly from QRM from Wifi.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore all Japanese operation is on 2400 - 2405.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
Input needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations ===&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Anyone using this technique to bring mains voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice from a professional electrician before doing it. The author is not responsible for your careless actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. Japan uses 10450MHz. This&lt;br /&gt;
is not a major obstacle to working Japan as will be explained later in this section.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Bartram G4DGU produced a good paper on small dish EME, you can read it here &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar and equatorial mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polar_mount&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical 3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI). Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=795</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=795"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:09:19Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* Dish feed optimisation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2.3GHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2400.0 - 2405 &amp;amp; 2424 *&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan, 13cm EME was first licensed in 1993 for JA4BLC. The band was then &lt;br /&gt;
2424.0-2424.5. On Jan 2015, the post authority in Japan allowed the operation on&lt;br /&gt;
2400-2405 for amateurs for EME and all Japanese moonbouncers moved&lt;br /&gt;
to 2400. The 2424.0-2424.5 segment is still allowed but suffers badly from QRM from Wifi.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore all Japanese operation is on 2400 - 2405.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
Input needed&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations ===&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Anyone using this technique to bring mains voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice from a professional electrician before doing it. The author is not responsible for your careless actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. Japan uses 10450MHz. This&lt;br /&gt;
is not a major obstacle to working Japan as will be explained later in this section.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Bartram G4DGU produced a good paper on small dish EME, you can read it here &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere. Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across&lt;br /&gt;
the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination&lt;br /&gt;
of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the&lt;br /&gt;
polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the&lt;br /&gt;
mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to&lt;br /&gt;
the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a&lt;br /&gt;
serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical&lt;br /&gt;
3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is&lt;br /&gt;
often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI). Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=794</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=794"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:08:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* 2.3GHz (13cm) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2.3GHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2400.0 - 2405 &amp;amp; 2424 *&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan, 13cm EME was first licensed in 1993 for JA4BLC. The band was then &lt;br /&gt;
2424.0-2424.5. On Jan 2015, the post authority in Japan allowed the operation on&lt;br /&gt;
2400-2405 for amateurs for EME and all Japanese moonbouncers moved&lt;br /&gt;
to 2400. The 2424.0-2424.5 segment is still allowed but suffers badly from QRM from Wifi.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore all Japanese operation is on 2400 - 2405.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations ===&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Anyone using this technique to bring mains voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice from a professional electrician before doing it. The author is not responsible for your careless actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. Japan uses 10450MHz. This&lt;br /&gt;
is not a major obstacle to working Japan as will be explained later in this section.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Bartram G4DGU produced a good paper on small dish EME, you can read it here &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere. Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across&lt;br /&gt;
the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination&lt;br /&gt;
of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the&lt;br /&gt;
polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the&lt;br /&gt;
mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to&lt;br /&gt;
the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a&lt;br /&gt;
serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical&lt;br /&gt;
3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is&lt;br /&gt;
often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI). Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=793</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=793"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:07:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 2.3GHz (13cm) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2400.0 - 2405 &amp;amp; 2424 *&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan, 13cm EME was first licensed in 1993 for JA4BLC. The band was then &lt;br /&gt;
2424.0-2424.5. On Jan 2015, the post authority in Japan allowed the operation on&lt;br /&gt;
2400-2405 for amateurs for EME and all Japanese moonbouncers moved&lt;br /&gt;
to 2400. The 2424.0-2424.5 segment is still allowed but suffers badly from QRM from Wifi.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore all Japanese operation is on 2400 - 2405.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations ===&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Anyone using this technique to bring mains voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice from a professional electrician before doing it. The author is not responsible for your careless actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. Japan uses 10450MHz. This&lt;br /&gt;
is not a major obstacle to working Japan as will be explained later in this section.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Bartram G4DGU produced a good paper on small dish EME, you can read it here &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere. Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across&lt;br /&gt;
the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination&lt;br /&gt;
of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the&lt;br /&gt;
polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the&lt;br /&gt;
mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to&lt;br /&gt;
the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a&lt;br /&gt;
serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical&lt;br /&gt;
3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is&lt;br /&gt;
often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI). Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=792</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=792"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T22:03:21Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* Location for the PA */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 2.3GHz (13cm) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2400.0 - 2405 &amp;amp; 2424 *&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan, 13cm EME was first licensed in 1993 for JA4BLC. The band was then &lt;br /&gt;
2424.0-2424.5. On Jan 2015, the post authority in Japan allowed the operation on&lt;br /&gt;
2400-2405 for amateurs for EME and all Japanese moonbouncers moved&lt;br /&gt;
to 2400. The 2424.0-2424.5 segment is still allowed but suffers badly from QRM from Wifi.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore all Japanese operation is on 2400 - 2405.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations ===&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Anyone using this technique to bring mains voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice from a professional electrician before doing it. The author is not responsible for your careless actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. Japan uses 10450MHz. This&lt;br /&gt;
is not a major obstacle to working Japan as will be explained later in this section.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Bartram G4DGU produced a good paper on small dish EME, you can read it here &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere. Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across&lt;br /&gt;
the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination&lt;br /&gt;
of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the&lt;br /&gt;
polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the&lt;br /&gt;
mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to&lt;br /&gt;
the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a&lt;br /&gt;
serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical&lt;br /&gt;
3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is&lt;br /&gt;
often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI). Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=791</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=791"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T21:47:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* Cross-band operation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 2.3GHz (13cm) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2400.0 - 2405 &amp;amp; 2424 *&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan, 13cm EME was first licensed in 1993 for JA4BLC. The band was then &lt;br /&gt;
2424.0-2424.5. On Jan 2015, the post authority in Japan allowed the operation on&lt;br /&gt;
2400-2405 for amateurs for EME and all Japanese moonbouncers moved&lt;br /&gt;
to 2400. The 2424.0-2424.5 segment is still allowed but suffers badly from QRM from Wifi.&lt;br /&gt;
Therefore all Japanese operation is on 2400 - 2405.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations ===&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''''''Anyone using this technique to bring 'mains' voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice&lt;br /&gt;
from a professional electrician before using it. The author is not responsible for your careless&lt;br /&gt;
actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''''Italic text'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. Japan uses 10450MHz. This&lt;br /&gt;
is not a major obstacle to working Japan as will be explained later in this section.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Bartram G4DGU produced a good paper on small dish EME, you can read it here &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere. Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across&lt;br /&gt;
the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination&lt;br /&gt;
of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the&lt;br /&gt;
polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the&lt;br /&gt;
mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to&lt;br /&gt;
the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a&lt;br /&gt;
serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical&lt;br /&gt;
3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is&lt;br /&gt;
often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI). Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=790</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=790"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T21:44:27Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* 10GHz (3cm) */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 2.3GHz (13cm) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2424.0 - 2424.1 &amp;amp; 2401&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations ===&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''''''Anyone using this technique to bring 'mains' voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice&lt;br /&gt;
from a professional electrician before using it. The author is not responsible for your careless&lt;br /&gt;
actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''''Italic text'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. Japan uses 10450MHz. This&lt;br /&gt;
is not a major obstacle to working Japan as will be explained later in this section.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Chris Bartram G4DGU produced a good paper on small dish EME, you can read it here &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[:File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere. Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across&lt;br /&gt;
the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination&lt;br /&gt;
of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the&lt;br /&gt;
polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the&lt;br /&gt;
mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to&lt;br /&gt;
the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a&lt;br /&gt;
serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical&lt;br /&gt;
3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is&lt;br /&gt;
often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI). Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:20140514Thoughts_on_small_dish_10GHz_EME.pdf&amp;diff=789</id>
		<title>File:20140514Thoughts on small dish 10GHz EME.pdf</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:20140514Thoughts_on_small_dish_10GHz_EME.pdf&amp;diff=789"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T21:43:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=788</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=788"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T21:40:17Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 2.3GHz (13cm) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2424.0 - 2424.1 &amp;amp; 2401&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations ===&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice used to be a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) but now solid &lt;br /&gt;
state is much more affordable with a surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appearing on the surplus market in the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM2683B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to 15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''''''Anyone using this technique to bring 'mains' voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice&lt;br /&gt;
from a professional electrician before using it. The author is not responsible for your careless&lt;br /&gt;
actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''''Italic text'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. Japan uses 10450MHz. This&lt;br /&gt;
is not a major obstacle to working Japan as will be explained later in this section.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere. Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across&lt;br /&gt;
the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination&lt;br /&gt;
of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the&lt;br /&gt;
polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the&lt;br /&gt;
mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to&lt;br /&gt;
the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a&lt;br /&gt;
serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical&lt;br /&gt;
3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is&lt;br /&gt;
often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI). Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=787</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=787"/>
				<updated>2020-05-25T21:37:14Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* Frequency allocations at 10GHz */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 2.3GHz (13cm) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2424.0 - 2424.1 &amp;amp; 2401&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations ===&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice is usually a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or solid&lt;br /&gt;
state. A surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appeared on the surplus market in&lt;br /&gt;
the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for&lt;br /&gt;
even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM23..B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''''''Anyone using this technique to bring 'mains' voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice&lt;br /&gt;
from a professional electrician before using it. The author is not responsible for your careless&lt;br /&gt;
actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''''Italic text'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. Japan uses 10450MHz. This&lt;br /&gt;
is not a major obstacle to working Japan as will be explained later in this section.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 0.6°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere. Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across&lt;br /&gt;
the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination&lt;br /&gt;
of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the&lt;br /&gt;
polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the&lt;br /&gt;
mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to&lt;br /&gt;
the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a&lt;br /&gt;
serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical&lt;br /&gt;
3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is&lt;br /&gt;
often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI). Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=772</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=772"/>
				<updated>2020-05-24T12:46:49Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cmbas.jpg|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 1&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:23cm2.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Figure 2&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 2.3GHz (13cm) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2424.0 - 2424.1 &amp;amp; 2401&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations ===&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000530.JPG|400px]]&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A 100W PA using a pair of G4BAO PA modules &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:P1000617.JPG|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
A 1900MHz PA module modified for 13cm by G4BAO &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice is usually a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or solid&lt;br /&gt;
state. A surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appeared on the surplus market in&lt;br /&gt;
the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for&lt;br /&gt;
even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM23..B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:RW1127.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
 A 14GHz RW1127 TWT modifed by G4NNS for 24GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[File:10GPA.jpg|400px]]&lt;br /&gt;
G4BAO's feedpoint mounted 10GHz PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''''''Anyone using this technique to bring 'mains' voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice&lt;br /&gt;
from a professional electrician before using it. The author is not responsible for your careless&lt;br /&gt;
actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''''Italic text'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. Japan uses 10450MHz. This&lt;br /&gt;
is not a major obstacle to working Japan as will be explained later in this section.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 3.5°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained elsewhere. Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across&lt;br /&gt;
the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination&lt;br /&gt;
of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the&lt;br /&gt;
polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the&lt;br /&gt;
mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to&lt;br /&gt;
the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a&lt;br /&gt;
serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical&lt;br /&gt;
3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is&lt;br /&gt;
often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI). Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:10GPA.jpg&amp;diff=771</id>
		<title>File:10GPA.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:10GPA.jpg&amp;diff=771"/>
				<updated>2020-05-24T12:44:28Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:RW1127.jpg&amp;diff=770</id>
		<title>File:RW1127.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:RW1127.jpg&amp;diff=770"/>
				<updated>2020-05-24T12:38:04Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:P1000530.JPG&amp;diff=769</id>
		<title>File:P1000530.JPG</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:P1000530.JPG&amp;diff=769"/>
				<updated>2020-05-24T12:32:52Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:P1000617.JPG&amp;diff=768</id>
		<title>File:P1000617.JPG</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:P1000617.JPG&amp;diff=768"/>
				<updated>2020-05-24T12:30:47Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:23cm2.jpg&amp;diff=767</id>
		<title>File:23cm2.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:23cm2.jpg&amp;diff=767"/>
				<updated>2020-05-24T12:24:35Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:23cmbas.jpg&amp;diff=766</id>
		<title>File:23cmbas.jpg</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=File:23cmbas.jpg&amp;diff=766"/>
				<updated>2020-05-24T12:22:39Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;File uploaded with MsUpload&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=765</id>
		<title>Main Page</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Main_Page&amp;diff=765"/>
				<updated>2020-05-24T12:18:06Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[file:ukuglogo.jpg|left|80px|middle]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;big&amp;gt;'''Welcome to the''' '''''[http://www.microwavers.org UK Microwave Group]''''' '''Wiki'''&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/big&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
The place to find information on equipment and projects for Amateur Microwave operation on bands above 1 GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This wiki is designed to be a reference library, developed by the UK Microwave Group for use by the worldwide microwave community. Any information which you feel is of use to others can be put on the Wiki, but please observe any copyright restrictions on your material you use. However, before you can add or edit content you will need to [[Registering|register for an account]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Contents ==&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Registering]] on the UK Microwave Wiki&lt;br /&gt;
=== New to Microwave operation? ===&lt;br /&gt;
* Get the basics in our collection of [[Getting Started|Getting Started guides]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Glossary and index of terms and TLAs used in Amateur Microwave operation [[Glossary of terms|Glossary of terms]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The UK Microwave Group Information and services===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Joining UK Microwave Group]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Beaconspot]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Contest Calendar]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[UK Microwave Group Youtube Channel]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Chip bank|The UK Microwave Chip Bank]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Scatterpoint Magazine ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Index of articles]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Archive edition|Archive editions]] download&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Project software]] download&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Microwave Roundtables ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Presentations]] Presentations from Roundtables.&lt;br /&gt;
* Recordings from Roundtables can be found on the UK Microwave Group Youtube channel.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Microwave SDR projects===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Hayling project]] The UK Microwave Group SDR transceiver&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Langstone Project]] The prototype microwave SDR project&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Getting on the Microwave Bands ===&lt;br /&gt;
The Low Bands:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[1.3 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[2.3 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[3.4 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The middle bands:&lt;br /&gt;
* [[5.7 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[10 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The High bands&lt;br /&gt;
* [[24 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[47 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[76 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Millimetre Bands&lt;br /&gt;
* [[122 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[134 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[241 GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Terahertz&lt;br /&gt;
* [[275+ GHz]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Operating ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Digital modes using WSJT]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Talkback for microwave operation including ON4KST]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://www.google.com/maps/d/u/0/edit?mid=1VeLnRRbLwloDTL2i9-HE2sxqL0c&amp;amp;ll=52.95536632179757%2C-0.49709419999999227&amp;amp;z=7 Google map] showing possible portable operating sites&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mapping tools]] including finding the IARU LOCATOR of a site, UK postcode to Lat and Long conversion and a topographic overlay for Google maps&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Propagation tools]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Microwave EME]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Construction projects ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[PE4302]] - PE4302 variable attenuator project&lt;br /&gt;
* [[ADF435x PIC]] - PIC controllers for Chinese ADF4350/4351 boards&lt;br /&gt;
=== G4BAO's Bodger's Guides ===&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* Modifying AFL 900MHz Hybrids for 23cms:  [[:File:900MHz Hybrids.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Modifying Kevin's splitters for wideband:  [[:File:Wideband splitter.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* 13cm PA using a G4BAO 23cm board and an MRF19085: [[:File:MRF19085.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Bodging 1900MHz QRO amps for 13cm:  [[:File:1900AMPS.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Using a Lucent ILam QRO SSPA on 13cm:  [[:File:ILAM_Mods1.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Using a ceramic MRF9045 in the G4BAO PA PCB:  [[:File:ceramic.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* A control board for a GaAsFET PA:  [[:File:GaAs PA control.doc]] &lt;br /&gt;
* A 70cm converter:  [[:File:70cm converter.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Dishal's method for tuning up filters:   [[:File:Dishal.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* Simple PIC controller to use as a beacon with the G4JNT synthesiser board:  [[:File:Beacon_PIC.doc]]&lt;br /&gt;
* A small, high current Stepdown PSU after a design by G3WDG:   [[:File:stepdown_PSU.pdf]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Useful Circuits and notes ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[ADF series of synthesizers]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Filters]] - Collection of links and designs for that most critical but over looked component!&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Pre-amps]] - Notes, suppliers and circuits of preamplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Power amplifiers]] - Notes, suppliers and circuits of power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
* [[LeoBodnar GPS Settings]]&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Waveguide]] - An introduction to Waveguides&lt;br /&gt;
* [[G3WDG Microwave Designs]] - Construction Notes for the G3WDG Series of Kits&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Miscellaneous Equipment manuals and schematics ===&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Mutek]] Circuits and documentation for the Mutek range of equipment&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Microwave modules]] Circuits and documentation for the Microwave modules range of equipment&lt;br /&gt;
* [[Cellflex]] Data sheets for Cellflex cables&lt;br /&gt;
* Spec and technical drawings of standard, anti-cocking and precision [https://flann.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Waveguide-and-Flange-Information.pdf Flann flanges]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Test equipment manuals ===&lt;br /&gt;
For HP and Agilent equipment see the UKMicrowaves Group files at&lt;br /&gt;
[https://groups.io/g/UKMicrowaves/files/Test%20Equipment%20-%20Manuals] &lt;br /&gt;
and [https://groups.io/g/HP-Agilent-Keysight-equipment groups.io] which has replaced the old&lt;br /&gt;
[https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/hp_agilent_equipment/info Yahoo group]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
 &amp;lt;sub&amp;gt;UKuG thanks BATC for hosting this facility&amp;lt;/sub&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=764</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=764"/>
				<updated>2020-05-24T12:15:46Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Example.jpg|Figure 1 an ultra light 1.3GHz digital modes EME system&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Example.jpg|Figure 2 Feed configuration for a CP dish feed&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 2.3GHz (13cm) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2424.0 - 2424.1 &amp;amp; 2401&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Pictures of 23cm power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Pictures of 13cm power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice is usually a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or solid&lt;br /&gt;
state. A surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appeared on the surplus market in&lt;br /&gt;
the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for&lt;br /&gt;
even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM23..B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Picture of a feedpoint mounted PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''''''Anyone using this technique to bring 'mains' voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice&lt;br /&gt;
from a professional electrician before using it. The author is not responsible for your careless&lt;br /&gt;
actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''''Italic text'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. Japan uses 10450MHz. This&lt;br /&gt;
is not a major obstacle to working Japan as will be explained later in this section.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 3.5°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained in chapter xxxxxx. Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across&lt;br /&gt;
the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination&lt;br /&gt;
of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the&lt;br /&gt;
polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the&lt;br /&gt;
mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to&lt;br /&gt;
the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a&lt;br /&gt;
serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical&lt;br /&gt;
3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is&lt;br /&gt;
often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI). Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=763</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=763"/>
				<updated>2020-05-24T12:12:05Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: /* Dish feed optimisation */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Example.jpg|Figure 1 an ultra light 1.3GHz digital modes EME system&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Example.jpg|Figure 2 Feed configuration for a CP dish feed&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 2.3GHz (13cm) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2424.0 - 2424.1 &amp;amp; 2401&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Pictures of 23cm power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Pictures of 13cm power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice is usually a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or solid&lt;br /&gt;
state. A surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appeared on the surplus market in&lt;br /&gt;
the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for&lt;br /&gt;
even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM23..B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Picture of a feedpoint mounted PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''''''Anyone using this technique to bring 'mains' voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice&lt;br /&gt;
from a professional electrician before using it. The author is not responsible for your careless&lt;br /&gt;
actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''''Italic text'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. Japan uses 10450MHz. This&lt;br /&gt;
is not a major obstacle to working Japan as will be explained later in this section.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 3.5°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained in chapter xxxxxx. Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across&lt;br /&gt;
the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination&lt;br /&gt;
of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the&lt;br /&gt;
polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the&lt;br /&gt;
mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to&lt;br /&gt;
the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a&lt;br /&gt;
serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical&lt;br /&gt;
3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is&lt;br /&gt;
often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI). Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=762</id>
		<title>Microwave EME</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.microwavers.org.uk/index.php?title=Microwave_EME&amp;diff=762"/>
				<updated>2020-05-24T12:11:12Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;G4bao: Created page with &amp;quot;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==  ===Introduction===  Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;== EME on the higher bands, Sam Jewell, G4DDK and John Worsnop, G4BAO ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
===Introduction===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Above the amateur radio 144MHz band low sky noise means EME takes on a different character.&lt;br /&gt;
Low sky noise (noise temperature) means that very weak signals can be heard against the&lt;br /&gt;
background noise that would otherwise be swamped by galactic and manmade noise on 144MHz&lt;br /&gt;
and below. Sensitive receivers, using very low noise amplifiers (LNA,) are even able to detect 'noise'&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon. Being a 'black body radiator' at a physical temperature of between 200 and 240k,&lt;br /&gt;
depending on the phase of the moon, its noise temperature can be readily detected against the&lt;br /&gt;
much lower background sky temperature of 2.7k. This is only possible when the beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
receiving antenna is small and the noise temperature of the LNA is very low. In practice it is very&lt;br /&gt;
difficult to detect moon noise at 432MHz with an 'amateur size' antenna, but at 1296MHz and&lt;br /&gt;
above it becomes increasingly easy up to 10GHz within purely amateur radio means. Above 10GHz&lt;br /&gt;
atmospheric gases contribute noise due to absorption and it again becomes increasingly difficult to&lt;br /&gt;
detect moon noise. The frequency range between 1GHz and 10GHz is commonly known as the&lt;br /&gt;
microwave low noise window due to the prevalent low sky noise temperature. There are five&lt;br /&gt;
amateur radio bands between these frequency limits and all of them are exploited by EME&lt;br /&gt;
enthusiasts in order to make DX EME contacts. 432MHz also exhibits low sky noise, but it is still&lt;br /&gt;
higher than the five 'microwave bands'. It is this ability to detect weak signals against a low sky&lt;br /&gt;
noise that makes the microwave bands attractive to many EME enthusiasts.&lt;br /&gt;
It is not critical that the EME operator is able to detect moon noise except on the higher of these&lt;br /&gt;
bands, only that the ability to do so shows that the receiving system is working as expected.&lt;br /&gt;
Detecting moon noise on 1296MHz is not essential and usually only possible with larger dish&lt;br /&gt;
antennas.&lt;br /&gt;
Note that I said that the beamwidth of the antenna must be small in order to detect moon noise.&lt;br /&gt;
What if the beamwidth is not narrow?&lt;br /&gt;
Then the antenna will see more cold sky than 'warm' moon. That also means that signals reflected&lt;br /&gt;
from the moon will be weaker since the moon fills less of the aperture that is the receive antenna.&lt;br /&gt;
Ideally, the beamwidth of the receive antenna will be exactly the same as the beamwidth that the&lt;br /&gt;
moon subtends on the surface of the earth (about 0.5°).&lt;br /&gt;
However, it is not quite that simple, as you might expect.&lt;br /&gt;
As radio operators we are interested in achieving enough signal to noise ratio (SNR) to be able to&lt;br /&gt;
communicate. The signal part is provided by the reflected signal and the more power that is directed&lt;br /&gt;
at the moon, the bigger the reflected signal received back on earth.&lt;br /&gt;
The noise part of the equation is the total noise contribution from a number of sources.&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise power is given by&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑃𝑟 = 𝑘𝑇𝐵&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where 𝑃𝑟 = 𝑅𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑝𝑜𝑤𝑒𝑟 𝑖𝑛 𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑡𝑠&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑘 = 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛'𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 1.38 ∗ 10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-23&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt; &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The total noise temperature detected by the receiver is made up of three main parts. These are&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑠𝑘𝑦 = 𝑛𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑘y in Kelvin  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have already seen that the sky noise temperature can be as low as 2.7k between 1 and 10GHz &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑛𝑛𝑎  in Kelvin&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 = 𝑁𝑜𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑡𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒  in Kelvin &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
𝐵 = 𝐵𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑤𝑖𝑑𝑡ℎ 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑟 in Hertz  &amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bandwidth of the receiver is the noise bandwidth, pre-detector, and will depend on the&lt;br /&gt;
modulation mode to be received. i.e. 2.5kHz for SSB, ~200Hz for CW and a few Hz for some digital&lt;br /&gt;
modes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In order to improve SNR we need to reduce something on the noise power side of the equation if we&lt;br /&gt;
cannot increase transmit power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Not much can be done to reduce Boltzmann's constant and the bandwidth is set by the mode of&lt;br /&gt;
modulation in use. That leaves us with reducing the total system noise temperature in order to&lt;br /&gt;
achieve better SNR. Sky temperature is already as low as we can expect (post big bang and 14 billion&lt;br /&gt;
years on!). Antenna noise temperature is something we can do something about and is the subject&lt;br /&gt;
of much antenna design and optimisation. Likewise, receiver noise temperature is also something&lt;br /&gt;
we can do something about. Modern Gallium Arsenide FET ( GaAs FET) technology has developed a&lt;br /&gt;
great deal in the last twenty to thirty years. Variants on the humble GaAs FET, such as the High&lt;br /&gt;
Electron Mobility Transistor ( HEMT), have enabled LNA designs to reach as low as 14k at room&lt;br /&gt;
temperature (without cooling) and 20k LNAs are already relatively low cost items.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Where does this leave the EME operator?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using dish or yagi antennas, HEMT LNAs and affordable solid state or valve amplifiers of 100W up to&lt;br /&gt;
500W rating there are currently many hundreds of EME stations operational on 1296MHz using SSB,&lt;br /&gt;
CW or digital (JT65C). The number of operational stations on the intermediate bands of 2.3, 3.4 and&lt;br /&gt;
5.7GHz is a bit lower and the reasons for this are covered later in this chapter. 10GHz has recently&lt;br /&gt;
become a very popular band, mainly because it has been shown possible to engineer a small but&lt;br /&gt;
effective system that can be used from home or from portable locations. The achievements of those&lt;br /&gt;
EME amateurs using small systems is remarkable and seems set to become even more popular in&lt;br /&gt;
the future.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following sections of this chapter cover equipment and techniques, as well as give guidance, to&lt;br /&gt;
operating on the microwave EME bands up to 10GHz.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1296MHz (23cm) and 2300MHz - 2400MHz (13cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The very first successful amateur radio EME contacts took place, not on VHF, but on 1296MHz back&lt;br /&gt;
in 19xx.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Without doubt the 1.3GHz band is the most popular EME band above 144MHz. This is probably&lt;br /&gt;
closely followed by 10GHz and then 2.3GHz. The possible reasons for this will be examined later in&lt;br /&gt;
this chapter. Activity on 3.4 and 5.7GHz tends to be limited to contests and Activity Weekends (AW).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since the techniques used for 1296 and 2300MHz are very similar it makes sense to group them&lt;br /&gt;
together for the purposes of this book. Where 2300MHz does differ is that there is no common&lt;br /&gt;
allocation for EME across all regions of the world due to differing requirements for mobile radio&lt;br /&gt;
spectrum.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The following table shows the mean EME, return, path loss for the three bands.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Band !! Mean path loss dB&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 1.3GHz || 271.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 2.3GHz|| 276.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| 10GHz || 288.9&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 1.3GHz (23cm)====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz is by far the most popular microwave EME band. The vast majority of EME operation takes&lt;br /&gt;
place between 1296.000MHz and 1296.100MHz, with CW tending to occupy the lower end of this&lt;br /&gt;
sub band and digital modes the upper end. SSB is not that common (except between bigger stations&lt;br /&gt;
and during the DUBUS SSB contest, where it tends to be a mixture of SSB and CW in cross mode&lt;br /&gt;
QSO.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Circular polarisation is almost always used although the big attraction for the beginner to microwave&lt;br /&gt;
EME may be the ability to make digital (JT65C or JT4) QSOs with medium and large stations using&lt;br /&gt;
just a single high gain Yagi, with elevation, and 50 to 100 Watts of RF power. Ground gain is virtually&lt;br /&gt;
non-existent on these bands, so elevation is desirable.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Several yagi antennas can be phased for circular polarisation, but this introduces undesirable&lt;br /&gt;
phasing line losses, so yagi equipped stations tend to use linear polarisation and accept the 3dB&lt;br /&gt;
penalty when working circularly polarised stations. In practice there is usually enough margin when&lt;br /&gt;
working medium to large dish equipped stations, that the polarisation mismatch is not a big&lt;br /&gt;
problem. Multiple yagi arrays can also be used, but care needs to be exercised to keep combining&lt;br /&gt;
excess loss to a minimum. Often a single long yagi will outperform an array. With a single yagi&lt;br /&gt;
system, the masthead preamp can be kept as close as possible to the antenna feed point to&lt;br /&gt;
minimise losses and hence keep the noise figure low.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Long helix antennas would seem to offer a solution to the problem of circular polarisation. A signal&lt;br /&gt;
reflected from the moon or any other object in front of the antenna will suffer a reversal of phase&lt;br /&gt;
(polarity). This means that the helix must be equipped for both right hand and left hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation. The added complication of doing this is often not worth the effort.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Using a small (~2 metre) dish, CW QSOs are also possible with the larger stations and home echoes&lt;br /&gt;
can be detected with waterfall displays. JT QSOs have been made with dishes as small as 1.2 metres.&lt;br /&gt;
Dish sizes of 3 metres and above and 100 or more Watts will enable you to hear your own echoes&lt;br /&gt;
and easily make CW QSOs. Even SSB QSOs will be possible with some of the bigger stations.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Small dishes are more difficult to feed without overspill and side lobes. As you have read earlier, this&lt;br /&gt;
makes the antenna noisy and the system noise figure are poorer. The consequence of this is that a&lt;br /&gt;
QRO station with a small dish will tend to be &amp;quot;alligators&amp;quot; i.e they are heard rather better than they&lt;br /&gt;
hears others. This can be mitigated by careful feed optimisation to minimise overspill and side lobes.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Practical 1.3GHz EME systems ====&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The bare minimum 1.3GHz system needed to make JT QSOs (as used by the Camb-Hams from the&lt;br /&gt;
Isle of Lewis in 2014) is shown in Figure 1. It consisted of a TS2000X with a remote PA and masthead&lt;br /&gt;
preamp. The antenna used was a single 55 element Yagi with an AZEL rotator. With hindsight, the&lt;br /&gt;
Tonna 55 element has a poor side lobe pattern (and hence inferior noise performance to something&lt;br /&gt;
like a 67 element Wimo or a Powabeam). While such a system is not recommended for a permanent&lt;br /&gt;
installation, it makes a very good way of taking a small EME system out for holiday operation on&lt;br /&gt;
1.3GHz and will produce a few QSOs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Example.jpg|Figure 1 an ultra light 1.3GHz digital modes EME system&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For a more permanent and CW-capable system for use from home, a dish with a minimum size of&lt;br /&gt;
2.5 to 3 metres should be used, and a proper circular polarised horn or patch feed. The only&lt;br /&gt;
difference with this system is the way that the antenna equipment is configured. Once again,&lt;br /&gt;
separate TX and RX feeders are used, but this time, one is connected to the Left Hand circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feed port for RX and the other to the Right Hand circular feed port for TX. Remember&lt;br /&gt;
that the sense of the polarisation reverses at moon reflection, meaning it &amp;quot;goes up Right Hand,&lt;br /&gt;
comes down Left Hand&amp;quot;&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As these two ports are part of the same feed system, there is much less isolation between them;&lt;br /&gt;
typically only 26dB for a well made CP feed compared to 80 dB for a good relay. With only 26dB&lt;br /&gt;
isolation between transmit and receive ports, 400Watts on transmit will produce 1 Watt OUT of the&lt;br /&gt;
receive port, destroying any preamp connected to it. While no high power TX RX changeover relay is&lt;br /&gt;
required, a relay must be used to isolate the receive port during Transmit. This configuration is&lt;br /&gt;
shown in Figure 1Figure 2. During transmit, the relay disconnects the input to the preamp from the&lt;br /&gt;
feed port and terminates it in 50 ohms. The coaxial relay need only be a low power one as all it has&lt;br /&gt;
to do is to isolate and terminate the preamplifier input during transmit, keeping any fed-through&lt;br /&gt;
transmit power from the sensitive LNA input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Example.jpg|Figure 2 Feed configuration for a CP dish feed&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/gallery&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 2.3GHz (13cm) ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The characteristics of 2.3GHz EME are very similar to 23cms. System design is fundamentally the&lt;br /&gt;
same except that Yagis are rarely used on this band as they are more difficult to construct and&lt;br /&gt;
optimise. Combine this with the fact that the accepted polarisation is circular, dishes become the&lt;br /&gt;
only sensible option.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Based on calculations with VK3UM's EMECalc and the availability of cheap surplus solid state high&lt;br /&gt;
power amplifiers, 2.3GHz is the band likely to give the best results with a very small (ultra light)&lt;br /&gt;
system such as a 1.5m dish, a preamp noise figure of 0.35dB, and a TX power of 100 to 200 Watts.&lt;br /&gt;
Despite this, 13cm is still a less popular band than one might expect based solely upon technical&lt;br /&gt;
constraints, and activity tends to be much lower than at 23cm. The main reason for this seems to be&lt;br /&gt;
the &amp;quot;fractured&amp;quot; allocation of the band throughout the world.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Cross-band operation ====&lt;br /&gt;
The available 13cm band is not consistent. Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&lt;br /&gt;
shows the various 13cm allocations used throughout the world. This makes both equipment and&lt;br /&gt;
operating slightly more complicated in that a means is needed to listen on a different frequency than&lt;br /&gt;
you are licensed to transmit on. Some form of cross band operation is needed to work certain&lt;br /&gt;
countries&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Table 1 Worldwide 13cm band allocations used for EME&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Location !! 13cm band EME usage (MHz)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |UK || 2320 - 2320.15 and 2301.9 - 2302 (by NoV)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |USA || 2304-2304.1&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Australia || 2301.9 - 2302&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Most of Europe ||2320 -2320.15 (and 2304-2304.1 in some countries)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| |Japan || 2424.0 - 2424.1 &amp;amp; 2401&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
From Europe it is accepted practice to work stations in the USA at 2304MHz via &amp;quot;cross-band.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
Europeans call on 2320.xxx MHz and listen for stations that are 16 MHz lower than their 2320MHz&lt;br /&gt;
frequency. This can be achieved using a 2320 to 144 MHz transverter with a separate 128MHz IF&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter to receive on 2304MHz. Calling “CQ down” or announcing on a reflector that you&lt;br /&gt;
are looking on 2320.X MHz lets the USA station know that he should transmit on 2304.xxx MHz after&lt;br /&gt;
adjusting for Doppler. A similar approach can be used to work Japan with a separate 2424MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
receive converter. UK 2300MHz NoV holders can work Australians directly in their band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== System Engineering for GHz Bands EME ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Dish feed optimisation ====&lt;br /&gt;
==== Low Noise Amplifiers and losses ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With EME above 1 GHz , we have to look at antennas in a slightly different way. First, we need to&lt;br /&gt;
remind ourselves that the noise power radiated by a &amp;quot;hot body&amp;quot; (in our case, what the antenna is&lt;br /&gt;
looking at) is given by kTB Watts, where k is Boltzmann's constant, T is its temperature in Kelvin (not&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;quot;degrees Kelvin!&amp;quot;) and B is the bandwidth of the noise measurement in Hz. In terrestrial systems&lt;br /&gt;
your antenna is pointing at the horizon, so it is &amp;quot;looking at&amp;quot; some combination of &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at&lt;br /&gt;
around 10K and ground, trees and houses at 290K. Typically for 1.3 and 2.3GHz this will total around&lt;br /&gt;
170K. Elevating the antenna above the horizon will mean it is just looking at &amp;quot;cold&amp;quot; sky at 10K, so&lt;br /&gt;
there will be a theoretical reduction in received noise power of 10log(10/170) or 12dB. Compare&lt;br /&gt;
looking at cold sky to looking at JUST the ground at 270K and the reduction in noise will be 14dB.&lt;br /&gt;
These numbers don't take account of two factors. The constant noise added by the receiver, and any&lt;br /&gt;
back or side lobes of the antenna. These two factors will contribute to increasing that temperature&lt;br /&gt;
and hence decreasing the difference between ground and cold sky measured by the antenna. Both&lt;br /&gt;
these factors are under our control. We can use low noise amplifier designs to minimise the noise&lt;br /&gt;
contribution of the receiver, and we can design our antenna systems to have &amp;quot;clean&amp;quot; patterns with&lt;br /&gt;
very low side lobes. The effect of horizon vs cold sky on system sensitivity and the results are&lt;br /&gt;
summarised in Table 2 below.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Table 2 An example of the difference in sensitivity between elevated and horizon-pointing systems&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
! Antenna points to !! RX Noise figure(dB)!! System NF(dB)!! System sensitivity (dBm)&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Horizon (170K)||  0.81 || 2.62|| -154&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Cold sky (10K)||  0.81 || 1.06 ||   -158.8&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Two things are interesting about these results. For the same receiver noise figure, the overall system&lt;br /&gt;
noise figure (including the antenna) is degraded by the antenna's temperature and an improvement&lt;br /&gt;
in overall system noise figure of about 1.5dB improves your sensitivity by nearly 5dB. Similarly,&lt;br /&gt;
small losses between the antenna and the preamplifier degrade your system sensitivity drastically.&lt;br /&gt;
This explains why microwave EME systems and antennas are optimised, not for maximum gain, but&lt;br /&gt;
for minimum side lobes and hence noise temperature. In the case of Yagis this means improving the&lt;br /&gt;
front to back and side lobe performance by careful design and placing the preamplifier as close as&lt;br /&gt;
possible to the antenna feed point. For a dish, it's all about making sure that the feed only&lt;br /&gt;
illuminates the dish, minimising &amp;quot;overspill&amp;quot; where the feed looks at the hot ground behind the dish,&lt;br /&gt;
and of course mounting the preamplifier close to the feed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking systems ====&lt;br /&gt;
TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
=== Power Amplifier considerations ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
On 23cm and to a lesser extent 13cm, valve PAs are still used. However, in more recent years the&lt;br /&gt;
move to solid state amplifiers has gained a lot of momentum. Valve PAs are still the preferred way to&lt;br /&gt;
generate powers in excess of 1000W with the popular TH series of vales being used in a number of&lt;br /&gt;
converted ex-TV transmitter amplifiers at 23cm. Some Russian valves have also been used to great&lt;br /&gt;
effect where these higher powers are required.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Solid state power amplifiers, with 23cm band outputs up to about 1000W, are available as kits as&lt;br /&gt;
well as built units. The most popular kit designs are currently those from W6PQL and PE1RKI with&lt;br /&gt;
built amplifiers available from Kuhne Electronic, Beko and SM4DHN.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In many cases the amplifier is available as a module and requires a control board to ensure it is not&lt;br /&gt;
over driven and is protected against overheating and antenna problems causing a high SWR. In&lt;br /&gt;
addition the use of sequencing ensures that the amplifier is not enabled until the preamplifier is&lt;br /&gt;
disconnected from the antenna.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The popular W6PQL control board is recommended. At least one manufacturer of complete power&lt;br /&gt;
amplifiers uses the W6PQL control board in their own product. Definitely high praise!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Pictures of 23cm power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 13cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One useful side effect of the rapid expansion in mobile communications has been the availability of&lt;br /&gt;
surplus high power ( 200W+) power amplifiers suitable for use in the 2300MHz - 2320MHz amateur&lt;br /&gt;
allocations. These amplifiers originally saw service as base station multichannel power amplifiers in&lt;br /&gt;
the 210-2170MHz '3G' allocation. Being multichannel the amplifiers were rated at, maybe, 30W.&lt;br /&gt;
However, because the base station combined a number of separate carriers, the peak envelope&lt;br /&gt;
power (PEP) rating was often well in excess of 200W. Most of the amplifiers have required some&lt;br /&gt;
minor modifications, but usually only in the control or power supply. Amateur use often meant that&lt;br /&gt;
the manufacturers ratings get abused and the protection circuits would not allow more than a few&lt;br /&gt;
seconds of power output at 200W. Disabling the protection circuits rarely seemed to cause problems&lt;br /&gt;
as long as sufficient cooling air was blown across the amplifier heatsink.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other possible problems are the ratings of the inevitable isolator at the amplifier output. Most of&lt;br /&gt;
those tested seemed quite happy at the elevated power levels, but a few have failed and required&lt;br /&gt;
replacing with an isolator with a higher rating, or removing completely. Sometimes the PCB output&lt;br /&gt;
tracks have been seen to burn up and these have also needed replacing. Usually with a short coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
link.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the very low cost of these surplus amplifiers they are a bargain and often worth combining in&lt;br /&gt;
pairs for even higher output. A 250W amplifier connected close to the feedpoint of a 2m diameter&lt;br /&gt;
dish, can be expected to produce audible echoes. However, attention to the efficiency of the dish&lt;br /&gt;
feed and the lowest noise figure preamplifier is probably necessary most of the time.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Pictures of 13cm power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 9cm and 6cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In these frequency bands the choice is usually a TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or solid&lt;br /&gt;
state. A surprising number of GaAs FET and GAN amplifiers have appeared on the surplus market in&lt;br /&gt;
the last few years. These are usually capable of 50w to 100W output and can often be combined for&lt;br /&gt;
even greater power output. Perhaps the best known GaAs FET power amplifier is the UM23..B manufactured by Toshiba. These are rated at 40W-50W output and have extremely high gain,making them suitable for mounting near the dish feed but driven from a transverter located in the shack. The loss of the connecting coaxial cable can often be tolerated by the low drive requirement of the PA. Unfortunately, as standard, the Toshiba amplifiers are quite inefficient and draw quite a lot of current (~18A at 12.6V) which might make them difficult to cool due to the high dissipation. Cooling fans are usually necessary. They can also be modified to reduce quiescent current.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
6cm band solid state amplifiers are often found on the surplus telecommunications market. These&lt;br /&gt;
are usually relatively low powered, with 10W to15w being quite common. Higher power amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
are occasionally seen on the surplus market, but combining two or more lower power amplifiers is&lt;br /&gt;
also feasible.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TWTAs are often used where higher power or multiple band use is required. Higher power TWTAs&lt;br /&gt;
use some very high helix voltages and unless you know what you are doing may be best avoided.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== 3cm power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Again, these can be found on the surplus market but in general solid state ones are limited to,&lt;br /&gt;
maybe, 20W. TWTAs delivering up to 300W can also be found on the surplus market, but 20W to&lt;br /&gt;
50W is more likely unless someone is parting with their higher power amplifier. The same comments&lt;br /&gt;
regarding care with high voltages applies with these amplifiers.&lt;br /&gt;
Pictures TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Location for the PA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Generating any significant power output costs money. It is a shame to waste any power in coaxial&lt;br /&gt;
feeder losses. Depending on how far the dish is from the shack it may be practical to locate the PA&lt;br /&gt;
inside the shack by using low loss coaxial cable for the transmit feeder. The largest size cable ought&lt;br /&gt;
to be used, consistent with remaining within the cable's maximum frequency. If low loss cable is&lt;br /&gt;
used then 1296MHz, 2300MHz and 3400MHz power amplifiers can be located inside. In general it is&lt;br /&gt;
better to mount 5760MHz and 10368MHz amplifier close to the dish feed as coaxial losses can&lt;br /&gt;
quickly consume valuable power.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Heliax® coaxial cable such as LDF5-50 or even 7-50 can be used on the lower three microwave bands&lt;br /&gt;
but as these cables cannot be rotated with the dish unless special precautions are taken, such as&lt;br /&gt;
rotary coaxial joints, it is usual to use a 'flexible' cable such as FSJ4-50 or LMR400UF® for the final&lt;br /&gt;
'drop'.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From a large dish mount to the feedpoint, around the rim of the dish, can be a significant distance&lt;br /&gt;
and should be taken into account. Opinions vary on whether it is better to take the coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish, direct to the feed, or to route via the rim. The danger with taking the&lt;br /&gt;
cable direct is that it introduces the possibility of stray reflection of ground noise to the feed. A cable&lt;br /&gt;
around the rim and then routed along one of the feed supports has the advantage that any reflection will be lower as the reflection occurs out towards the edge of the dish where the illumination is lower.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Undoubtedly mounting the power amplifier near the feedpoint, such as in the 'cage', allows much&lt;br /&gt;
lower losses but in turn means that power supplies need to be brought out to the amplifier (usually&lt;br /&gt;
along the feed support). In addition the extra weight of the power amplifier and its cooling&lt;br /&gt;
arrangement, if using a prime focus dish, may distort the dish shape, leading to unwanted gain loss&lt;br /&gt;
and maybe destructive beam lobes. Offset dishes are often easier in this respect because the weight&lt;br /&gt;
is carried on an arm below or above the dish and often not directly part of the dish structure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A possible compromise is to mount the power amplifier immediately behind the dish with the&lt;br /&gt;
minimum of cable to the feedpoint, bearing in mind the comments about routing via the dish rim or&lt;br /&gt;
through the centre of the dish. A heavy power amplifier can act as a useful counterweight to the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. Whether the power amplifier is located at the feedpoint or behind the dish, it will need to be&lt;br /&gt;
weatherproofed, of course.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Picture of a feedpoint mounted PA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A further consideration is the power amplifier power supply. If using a TWTA then there are extra&lt;br /&gt;
high voltages to consider and dampness is a real enemy here. Even solid stage amplifiers can need&lt;br /&gt;
up to around 50V (currently) and although this is generally considered safe it is wise to ensure that&lt;br /&gt;
you do not come into accidental contact with the supply.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The power supply could be in the shack and suitably rated DC connections brought out to the&lt;br /&gt;
amplifier, preferably in a suitable duct. However, the current drawn by many solid state amplifiers&lt;br /&gt;
will mean either using a very large gauge DC cable conductor to minimise voltage drop or using a&lt;br /&gt;
power supply with remote DC sensing to maintain the supply voltage at the amplifier end of the DC&lt;br /&gt;
feed.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
an interesting idea, suggested by GM4PMK, and implemented by Roger in his 23cm EME system, is&lt;br /&gt;
to use a 'building site transformer'. These are the yellow, sealed, transformers used on building sites&lt;br /&gt;
to power drills etc. Suitable transformers are readily available from many tool stores at very&lt;br /&gt;
reasonable cost. Long, pre-terminated, yellow 'mains leads are also available.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle here is that the transformed take 230V AC mains in and supply 55-0-55V output. The&lt;br /&gt;
mains earth is continued through from the AC input side to the end of the 'yellow' cable. In the&lt;br /&gt;
event of accidental contact with one of the two 'live' connections the maximum voltage to ground is&lt;br /&gt;
limited to 55V (mean). Whilst this is still dangerous it is regarded as a little safer than full mains.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At the remote end of the 110V AC power lead a dual voltage switch mode power supply unit&lt;br /&gt;
(SMPSU) receives the 110V AC and supplies the required DC output voltage. Suitable surplus power&lt;br /&gt;
supplies are available with DC output voltages ranging from less than 12V to 50V from either 110 or 230V AC input. Usually the SMPSU accepts any AC voltage between these two extremes (and&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally down to about 85V).&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''''''Anyone using this technique to bring 'mains' voltages out to a dish is recommended to seek advice&lt;br /&gt;
from a professional electrician before using it. The author is not responsible for your careless&lt;br /&gt;
actions!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;'''''Italic text'''''&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Photo of SMPSU and 110V transformer&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 10GHz (3cm) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Frequency allocations at 10GHz ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By far the most commonly used frequency allocation in the 10GHz EME band is 10368MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10370MHz, with most EME activity taking place around 10368.100MHz. Japan uses 10450MHz. This&lt;br /&gt;
is not a major obstacle to working Japan as will be explained later in this section.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Tracking is without doubt the key to success in 10GHz EME. Unless very small dishes are being used&lt;br /&gt;
the narrow beamwidth of most EME dishes make it more difficult to track the moon across the sky&lt;br /&gt;
than on the lower bands. The moon subtends an angle of approximately 0.5° at the earth's surface.&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, this varies slightly depending on whether the moon is at apogee or perigee. A 2.5m&lt;br /&gt;
diameter EME dish has a half power (3dB) beamwidth of approximately 3.5°. Even small movements&lt;br /&gt;
of the dish can cause several dB of signal loss. When a signal is marginal that can be the difference&lt;br /&gt;
between success and failure.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Finding the moon can also be a big problem. An absolute tracking system (one that points exactly&lt;br /&gt;
where directed) needs to have an accuracy of around 0.5° and a resolution of 0.1°. That is a difficult&lt;br /&gt;
demand because although the tracking encoders may have sufficient resolution, play in the rotator&lt;br /&gt;
bearings, distortion of the dish as it elevates or sag in the feed cage can all lead to significant errors.&lt;br /&gt;
It is also worth noting that at moon rise and moon set the position of the moon may not appear to&lt;br /&gt;
be correct because of signal refraction in the earth's troposphere. Locations close to large bodies of&lt;br /&gt;
water, such as the North Sea or the Great Lakes of North America are especially prone to this effect.&lt;br /&gt;
Even with accurate absolute position tracking it is often necessary to 'nudge' the dish position to&lt;br /&gt;
maximise signal levels. The problem is how do you know where to aim the dish if there are no&lt;br /&gt;
signals to peak on? The first paragraph of this chapter gives a clue.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Because the moon subtends a roughly similar angle to a medium size EME dish beamwidth, an&lt;br /&gt;
accurately aimed dish sees mainly the moon and little of the cold sky that surrounds it. The moon is&lt;br /&gt;
much warmer than the cold sky, averaging several hundred k (Kelvin) compared to, perhaps, 2.7 -&lt;br /&gt;
10k for the sky. As long as the receiver (more specifically, the front end low noise amplifier or LNA) is&lt;br /&gt;
sufficiently sensitive it will see the moon as a bright beacon of noise in a sea of cold sky. In practice,&lt;br /&gt;
with larger dishes, an LNA noise figure of less than 1dB is often sufficient and 0.6 - 0.7dB is enough&lt;br /&gt;
with smaller dishes (&amp;lt;3m). Noise figures below about 0.6dB are difficult to achieve at 10GHz. You&lt;br /&gt;
should not be fooled by the claims of 0.1dB noise figures for some Ku band (12GHz) satellite TV LNBs&lt;br /&gt;
(down converters). These are marketing men's numbers. They are not real! This also means that&lt;br /&gt;
bigger dishes cannot benefit from greater sensitivity as they have reached close to their limit once&lt;br /&gt;
the moon fully fills the dish receiver aperture. For those using smaller dishes, such as the popular&lt;br /&gt;
1.8 and 2.4m offset dishes, selecting a good LNA is still very important.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some form of noise amplifier and detector can be used to find, and then keep the dish antenna&lt;br /&gt;
pointed accurately at the moon as it moves across the sky. Noise amplifiers will be described more&lt;br /&gt;
fully later in this chapter.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The recent availability of a high power moon-directed 10.368.025GHz beacon transmission from the&lt;br /&gt;
DL0SHF 7.6m diameter earth station dish has considerably eased the problem of finding and then&lt;br /&gt;
tracking the moon, although in practice the beacon is not always on when the moon is 'up' and at&lt;br /&gt;
the time of writing this most useful signal is also suffering from some problems with varying signal&lt;br /&gt;
level.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Moving now to how the dish is moved and able to track the moon. This section discusses rotators&lt;br /&gt;
including screw jacks and other methods of moving the dish.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Moving the dish ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To move a dish of any size requires motors. These could be electric, hydraulic, pneumatic or manual.&lt;br /&gt;
Electric motors are by far the most popular. A suitable gearbox, with minimal backlash, is required to&lt;br /&gt;
reduce the speed of rotation of most electric motors. Some very small portable systems use manual&lt;br /&gt;
adjustment based on the use of a camera or surveyor's tripod.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There are two main types of mount and depending on the type different types of rotator can be&lt;br /&gt;
used.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
====Polar mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Polar mounts are popular but not always well understood. The polar or equatorial mount principle is&lt;br /&gt;
explained in chapter xxxxxx. Although this mount seems to be an easy way to track the moon across&lt;br /&gt;
the sky and appears to need only one drive motor for the GHA movement, in practice the declination&lt;br /&gt;
of the moon changes sufficiently in a short period of time because of the narrow beamwidth of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish and this means that a declination drive is also desirable. Possibly the biggest drawback to the&lt;br /&gt;
polar mount is that it really requires the use of circular polarisation. The reason for this is that as the&lt;br /&gt;
mount moves from side to side so the angle of the feed changes (longitudinal skew) with respect to&lt;br /&gt;
the moon. If linear polarisation is used then there could be a serious misalignment of the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation between two stations with one in, say, Europe and one in North America, as the&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation skew is approximately 90° if both are using linear polarisation. This would lead to a&lt;br /&gt;
serious loss of signal due to the cross polarisation. If both stations use circular polarisation then there is no problem as there is no change in polarisation due to the 90° difference. However, a significant number of stations still use linear polarisation. The simple expedient of using vertical linear polarisation in Europe and horizontal in North America and far Asia means that the skew is automatically taken care of. Simple and effective.&lt;br /&gt;
A linearly polarised station can still work a circularly polarised station, but there will be a theoretical&lt;br /&gt;
3dB loss in signal due to the polarisation. Due to depolarisation of the reflected signal, the loss is&lt;br /&gt;
often less than 3dB.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
No doubt you are wondering why anyone would want to continue to use linear polarisation when&lt;br /&gt;
effective circular polarised feed designs are readily available? The answer is complicated and&lt;br /&gt;
involves arguments about depolarisation of moon-reflected signals, additional losses in circular&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation feeds and the easy availability of commercial (or the manufacture ) of linearly polarised&lt;br /&gt;
feeds. The disagreements over circular vs linear have waged for many years and show no sign of&lt;br /&gt;
being resolved as yet!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The polar mount Right Ascension (RA) movement is often driven by a simple linear actuator (jack),&lt;br /&gt;
whilst either a motorised car jack or even a manual car jack is used to change the declination.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Elevation over Azimuth mounts ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There is also an azimuth over elevation type of drive, but these are not covered here. They are not&lt;br /&gt;
often used by EME operators. A two motor drive is used with azimuth/ elevation often known as AZEL mounts. A very popular AZEL drive is the RAS made by SPID in Poland. These are available as either the standard RAS or the larger BIG RAS. The BIG RAS is better suited to dishes over about 2.4m in diameter, whereas the RAS is perfectly suited to smaller dishes as long as the elevation drive is well balanced. Such mounts are&lt;br /&gt;
widely available in Europe as well as in the USA and Canada. Many EME operators have chosen to build their own drives based on local availability of motors and gearboxes. As well as electric motor drive it is possible to use Hydraulic motor drives. This subject is rather more specialised than can be covered in this short Wiki.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Tracking encoders ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whichever route the EME operator takes, either acquiring or building a suitable drive, it will be&lt;br /&gt;
necessary to use position encoders to indicate the position of the dish and provide positional&lt;br /&gt;
feedback to the tracking system. These encoders can be of various sorts with the best probably&lt;br /&gt;
being the USDigital absolute encoders or the MAB absolute encoders. Both of these can be used to&lt;br /&gt;
indicate the absolute position of the dish in both azimuth and elevation when connected to suitable&lt;br /&gt;
position read outs.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Non-absolute Pulse counting position encoders rely on the dish moving a known amount for each&lt;br /&gt;
output pulse. However, the actual position depends on knowing the starting position and whether&lt;br /&gt;
the dish is moving clockwise or anti-clockwise as well as up or down. A non-volatile memory of some&lt;br /&gt;
sort is required to store the last position of the dish for when power is removed or the last position&lt;br /&gt;
information is lost and recalibration will be required before tracking can resume. Old digital satellite TV dish positioners can be used as the necessary up/down count and non-volatile memory are&lt;br /&gt;
already provided, together with some form of digital position read-out.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
TBA Moon noise tracking explained&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In Japan the 10368MHz allocation is not permitted and the Japanese amateurs tend to use&lt;br /&gt;
10450.100MHz. Working Japanese amateurs using in-band cross-band between 10368 and&lt;br /&gt;
10450MHz is quite common and is easily achieved in a number of ways including dedicated&lt;br /&gt;
equipment for both bands as well as (outside Japan) frequency down converters from 10450MHz to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz. Obviously a frequency up converter can be used in the same way, in Japan, to listen to&lt;br /&gt;
10368MHz EME signals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A simple, straightforward, converter does not need to use an SHF conversion oscillator as shown in&lt;br /&gt;
fig AA TBA&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Contrary to what some may believe, modern 10GHz systems tend to use coaxial cable&lt;br /&gt;
interconnections with waveguide being consigned mainly to the antenna connections and high power&lt;br /&gt;
stages. to be slotted in somewhere&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Equipment requirements ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Transverters ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverting is the most common way to reach the higher microwave bands. A wide range of&lt;br /&gt;
transverters are available for all the popular bands and even into the millimetre wave frequency&lt;br /&gt;
range. At 10GHz the most popular transverter designs are those manufactured by Kuhne Electronic&lt;br /&gt;
GmbH (DB6NT) and Down East Microwave Inc. (N2CEI). Some years ago Charlie Suckling (G3WDG)&lt;br /&gt;
together with Petra Suckling (G4KGC) produced a very cost effective 10GHz transverter. These are no&lt;br /&gt;
longer commercially available but are sometimes found on the surplus market. Similarly, GW4DGU&lt;br /&gt;
produced a very nice 10GHz transverter system for a number of years. Although no longer available,&lt;br /&gt;
used examples are sometimes found at microwave events.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transverter intermediate frequencies (IF) of either 144MHz or 432MHz are both in use. Care must be&lt;br /&gt;
taken when using a 144MHz IF that the image frequency 288MHz below the wanted 10368MHz is&lt;br /&gt;
well suppressed or noise at the image frequency may make the transverter noise figure appear 'too&lt;br /&gt;
good' by up to 3dB. As well as potentially causing unintended interference to any commercial system&lt;br /&gt;
operating in the image frequency band.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whilst a transverter local oscillator may use a 'free running' crystal oscillator, with temperature&lt;br /&gt;
stabilisation it is highly preferable that the local oscillator is frequency locked to either a GPS&lt;br /&gt;
disciplined reference, Oven Controlled Crystal Oscillator ( OCXO) or Rubidium reference, at 10MHz.&lt;br /&gt;
The Kuhne Electronic GmbH MKU10G3 transverter uses a 10MHz reference input.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== The LNA ====&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A transverter, on its own, is unlikely to have a low enough noise figure at 10GHz to give acceptable&lt;br /&gt;
EME results. A low noise amplifier (LNA) is usually required. Both homemade and commercial LNAs&lt;br /&gt;
are used. Noise figures tend to be from around 0.6dB up to around 1dB, with HEMT transistors the&lt;br /&gt;
most common active device used in LNAs. Popular homebuilt designs are the G3WDG and W5LUA preamps. Both of these are single stage designs and at 10GHz it is often necessary to have a little more gain to overcome inter-stage cable losses. Multistage LNA designs, by a number of amateurs, have appeared in the pages of DUBUS and VHF Communications over the years.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==== Power amplifiers ====&lt;br /&gt;
These are usually either TWTA (Travelling Wave Tube Amplifier) or SSPA (Solid State Power&lt;br /&gt;
Amplifier). TWTA are available surplus with power output levels of over 300W. At these power levels&lt;br /&gt;
the high voltage requirements of the TWT (Travelling Wave Tube) is very high and safety is very&lt;br /&gt;
much a concern, with voltages of over 3kV being common. Since transmission line losses are high at&lt;br /&gt;
10GHz, it is common to mount the TWTA close to the feed-point to minimise power loss and this&lt;br /&gt;
implies the power supply being mounted outside, usually in a weatherproof container or&lt;br /&gt;
occasionally in the open, but only installed when required and the weather is kind. In turn this&lt;br /&gt;
implies a mains power outlet close to the dish. It is beyond the scope of this book to cover the&lt;br /&gt;
regulations governing provision of outdoor mains supplies. These will vary from country to country&lt;br /&gt;
and are updated at regular intervals.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SSPA amplifiers are available both commercially and on the surplus market. Power output&lt;br /&gt;
requirements will depend on which modes the user intends to operate. Digital modes like JT4 can be&lt;br /&gt;
effective with small dishes and power levels of as low as 10W. In general a power level of between&lt;br /&gt;
25 and 50W would be desirable but inevitably more expensive.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The use of GaN (Gallium Nitride) devices has become more popular recently [xx]due to the (slowly)&lt;br /&gt;
falling prices of GaN power transistors. GaN is an excellent semiconductor material for power&lt;br /&gt;
devices as it exhibits high gain, tolerance to high junction temperatures and operates with, typically&lt;br /&gt;
48-50 volts, and therefore requires lower power supply current capability for a given output power&lt;br /&gt;
compared to GaAs (Gallium Arsenide) devices. Photo XX shows A 30w GaN amplifier.&lt;br /&gt;
One possible solution to the high voltage requirement of a GaN amplifier is to use a 48V SMPSU&lt;br /&gt;
(Switch Mode Power Supply Unit) supplied from a 110V supply. 110V supplies are common on&lt;br /&gt;
building sites as the familiar yellow encased isolation transformers that take in 230V and output 50 -&lt;br /&gt;
0-50V with the centre grounded. This way the AC voltage is a maximum of 50v (mean) with respect&lt;br /&gt;
to ground. At the dish end of the external supply a suitable 48V output SMPSU with 110V input can&lt;br /&gt;
be used to derive the wanted operating voltage. Such SMPSUs are common on Ebay and surplus for&lt;br /&gt;
sale at many radio rallies. It should be added that this is a suggestion only and you use the idea at&lt;br /&gt;
your own risk. Suitable transformers are available for around £56-£70 at many electrical discount&lt;br /&gt;
outlets in the UK. The yellow 2.5mm cable, of around 14m length with suitable plugs and sockets&lt;br /&gt;
fitted, can also be bought for around £30. Photo xy shows a 110v transformer.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Feeds and Switches ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to effectively illuminate the dish reflector, whether prime focus or offset elliptical, requires&lt;br /&gt;
a suitable feed antenna. The feed antenna is usually known as a the 'feed'. The feed can be a horn or&lt;br /&gt;
some other arrangement such as a patch. Whatever type of feed is chosen will depend on the focal&lt;br /&gt;
length or dish diameter (f/D) and whether circular or linear polarisation is required. The purpose of&lt;br /&gt;
the feed is to launch the signal, impose the polarisation required and then illuminate the dish with&lt;br /&gt;
the optimum spread of signal across the reflector. It is usual to arrange the transmit signal level to&lt;br /&gt;
be around 10dB lower at the edge of the dish (edge illumination) compared with at the centre of the&lt;br /&gt;
dish. However, this may not be optimum for receive, where the edge illumination is probably better&lt;br /&gt;
set at around 14dB down on the centre. This reduces 'spill over' and makes the dish 'quieter'. Most&lt;br /&gt;
EME operators tend to prefer the quieter dish than that giving maximum transmit gain. The&lt;br /&gt;
exceptions are those who like to 'hear their own voice' They are often referred to as 'alligators'!&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Linear vs circular polarisation ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Up to 432MHz linear polarisation, whether vertical or horizontal, is used. Circular is not easy to&lt;br /&gt;
arrange due to the need to provide for reverse circular polarisation switching due the moon&lt;br /&gt;
reflection (polarisation reverses on reflection). On 1296MHz and above the use of dish reflectors&lt;br /&gt;
makes dual polarisation feeds much easier to manufacture. Circular polarisation is almost exclusively&lt;br /&gt;
used on the 1296, 2300/2304/2320/2400, 3400 and 5660MHz EME bands. At 10368/10450MHzthat&lt;br /&gt;
is not always the case. Why?&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The nature of the moon at 10GHz is such that a significant amount of depolarisation takes place&lt;br /&gt;
when signals undergo reflection. The size of surface obstructions, including boulders, can cause&lt;br /&gt;
multiple scattering of signals and some areas of the moon permit significant subsurface reflection.&lt;br /&gt;
All of this can make the use of circular polarisation less effective than it might otherwise be.&lt;br /&gt;
Until recently the availability of low loss circular polarisation feed designs was poor. That has now&lt;br /&gt;
changed and feeds based on the use of squeezed waveguide and septum polarisers are in common&lt;br /&gt;
use. However, many fine examples of linear polarisation feeds, such as the once commonly used and&lt;br /&gt;
available Chaparral feed, are available and still in common use.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It happens that the majority of intercontinental activity takes place between Europe, North America,&lt;br /&gt;
Australasia and Asia. These places are (approximately) separated by 90°. A signal transmitted to the&lt;br /&gt;
moon at zenith will (mainly) return with the same polarisation. The same, vertically polarised, signal&lt;br /&gt;
sent to the moon from, say, Europe, and received in North America with be received as horizontal. A&lt;br /&gt;
standard has evolved whereby North American stations transmit to the moon using horizontal&lt;br /&gt;
polarisation and Europeans use vertical polarisation. Australasia also uses vertical as it is 180° from&lt;br /&gt;
Europe and 90° from North America. This system has been shown to work well and although there is&lt;br /&gt;
theoretically up to a 3dB penalty when working any circular polarised station, depolarisation of the&lt;br /&gt;
reflected signal often reduces this by several dB. For the beginner there is much to recommend the&lt;br /&gt;
simplicity of linear polarisation. No doubt in the future circular polarisation will predominate, but it&lt;br /&gt;
won't happen overnight.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>G4bao</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>